Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Food Chem. 2020 Nov 1;329:127148. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127148. Epub 2020 May 26.
The performance of a whey protein hydrolysate (WPH) for producing physically and chemically stable omega-3 emulsions was compared to hydrolysates obtained from other sustainable protein sources such as soy (SPH) and blue whiting (BPH). The oxidative stability of hydrolysate-stabilized emulsions was greatly influenced by their physical stability. Emulsion stabilized with BPH suffered a constant increase in droplet size and BPH was not able to prevent omega-3 oxidation, showing high concentration of volatiles. The peroxide value of SPH emulsion increased after the first day of storage, but it had a lower concentration of volatiles. In contrast, WPH-stabilized emulsion, which did not had any change in droplet size during storage, showed the highest oxidative stability. Therefore, our results confirmed that WPH is an interesting option for physical and oxidative stabilization of omega-3 emulsions, while SPH could be used in emulsions with shorter storage time such as pre-emulsions for microencapsulation of omega-3 oils.
乳清蛋白水解物(WPH)在生产物理和化学稳定的ω-3 乳液方面的性能与其他可持续蛋白质来源(如大豆(SPH)和蓝鳕鱼(BPH))的水解物进行了比较。水解物稳定的乳液的氧化稳定性受其物理稳定性的影响很大。用 BPH 稳定的乳液滴尺寸不断增加,BPH 无法防止 ω-3 氧化,显示出高挥发性物质浓度。SPH 乳液的过氧化物值在储存第一天后增加,但挥发性物质浓度较低。相比之下,WPH 稳定的乳液在储存过程中滴尺寸没有任何变化,表现出最高的氧化稳定性。因此,我们的结果证实,WPH 是物理和氧化稳定 ω-3 乳液的一个有趣选择,而 SPH 可以用于储存时间较短的乳液,例如用于微胶囊化 ω-3 油的预乳液。