Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Basingstoke and North Hampshire hospital, Aldermaston road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Basingstoke, UK.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 2;20(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01475-0.
The standard approach to treat cataracts is Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (DSBCS), during which patients have a separate operation date for each eye. An alternative method of delivery is Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS). The aim of this project was to examine the attitudes and beliefs of UK ophthalmologists towards ISBCS, explore their reasons to either practise or not practise ISBCS and identify barriers hindering its implementation in the UK.
A questionnaire was distributed to consultant members of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) and collected electronically. An initial screening question in regards to prior experience with ISBCS directed the rest of the survey; participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors with regards to performing ISBCS. Free text options were also available. Descriptive analysis was subsequently performed.
Of the 1357 recipients, 130 (9.6%) ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of those, 13.9% were currently performing ISBCS, 83.1% had never performed, and 3.1% had previously done so but since stopped. The main factors that acted as barriers were lack of: (1) College approval (20.5%); (2) medico-legal approval (20.2%); (3) evidence to support the use of ISBCS (16.0%); and (4) hospital approval (13.3%). Additionally, the perceived risk of complications for patients played an important role when considering ISBCS, with the risk of endophthalmitis being most feared.
This survey demonstrates some of the barriers that prevent ophthalmologist's performing ISBCS in the UK. There is a need for further exploration in this field to evaluate the effect of addressing any of these concerns on the implementation of ISBCS.
治疗白内障的标准方法是延迟序贯双侧白内障手术(DSBCS),在此期间,每位患者的双眼手术日期分开。另一种手术方式是立即序贯双侧白内障手术(ISBCS)。本项目旨在调查英国眼科医生对 ISBCS 的态度和信念,探讨他们进行或不进行 ISBCS 的原因,并确定阻碍其在英国实施的障碍。
向英国皇家眼科学院(RCOphth)的顾问成员分发问卷,并以电子方式收集。关于对 ISBCS 的先前经验的初步筛选问题指导了调查的其余部分;要求参与者就进行 ISBCS 的几个因素的重要性进行评分。也提供了自由文本选项。随后进行了描述性分析。
在 1357 名收件人中,有 130 名(9.6%)眼科医生完成了调查。其中,13.9%的人目前正在进行 ISBCS,83.1%的人从未进行过,3.1%的人以前进行过但已停止。主要的障碍因素是缺乏:(1)学院批准(20.5%);(2)医疗法律批准(20.2%);(3)支持使用 ISBCS 的证据(16.0%);(4)医院批准(13.3%)。此外,当考虑 ISBCS 时,患者并发症的风险也起着重要作用,其中最担心的是眼内炎的风险。
这项调查表明了一些阻止英国眼科医生进行 ISBCS 的障碍。需要进一步探讨这一领域,以评估解决这些问题对 ISBCS 实施的影响。