Suppr超能文献

亚甲蓝对氨氯地平中毒猪模型的影响。

Effect of Methylene Blue on a Porcine Model of Amlodipine Toxicity.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, United Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Med Toxicol. 2020 Oct;16(4):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00780-w. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdoses cause significant morbidity and mortality. Dihydropyridine CCBs cause peripheral vascular dilation and at high doses cardiac dysfunction. Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine, causes peripheral vasodilation from release of nitric oxide (NO) in addition to calcium channel blockade; NO scavenging is a potential treatment. Methylene blue (MB) inhibits NO directly and inhibits NO production. We compared the effects of MB versus norepinephrine (NE), with time to death as the primary outcome, in a porcine amlodipine toxicity model.

METHODS

Animals were anesthetized and instrumented, and an amlodipine infusion was administered to mimic oral overdose. After 70 minutes, each group was resuscitated with normal saline. Animals in each group were then randomized to receive either MB or NE. Hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, were recorded every 10 minutes. The primary outcome was survival time (Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test).

RESULTS

Interim analysis after 15 animals (7 MB, 8 NE) revealed that MB was clearly not superior to NE. Overall, 1 of 7 animals in the MB group survived to 300 minutes compared with 2 of 8 animals in the NE group. The median survival time was 100 minutes for the MB group and 177 minutes for the NE group. Survival time did not differ by group (log-rank test p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

In this porcine model of amlodipine toxicity, methylene blue did not improve survival time compared with norepinephrine. Whether methylene blue is beneficial in combatting distributive shock in amlodipine toxicity remains unclear and requires further study.

摘要

简介

钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)过量会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。二氢吡啶类 CCB 会引起外周血管扩张,高剂量时会引起心脏功能障碍。氨氯地平是一种二氢吡啶类药物,除了钙通道阻断作用外,还通过释放一氧化氮(NO)引起外周血管扩张;NO 清除是一种潜在的治疗方法。亚甲蓝(MB)可直接抑制 NO 并抑制 NO 的产生。我们比较了 MB 与去甲肾上腺素(NE)在猪氨氯地平毒性模型中的作用,以死亡时间为主要结局。

方法

动物麻醉并进行仪器操作,给予氨氯地平输注模拟口服过量。70 分钟后,各组用生理盐水复苏。然后,每组动物随机接受 MB 或 NE。每 10 分钟记录一次血流动力学参数,包括平均动脉压和心输出量。主要结局是生存时间(Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验)。

结果

15 只动物(7 只 MB,8 只 NE)的中期分析显示,MB 明显不如 NE。总的来说,MB 组有 1 只动物存活到 300 分钟,而 NE 组有 2 只动物存活到 300 分钟。MB 组的中位生存时间为 100 分钟,NE 组的中位生存时间为 177 分钟。两组生存时间无差异(对数秩检验 p=0.29)。

结论

在该猪模型中,与去甲肾上腺素相比,亚甲蓝并没有改善氨氯地平毒性的生存时间。亚甲蓝在治疗氨氯地平毒性引起的分布性休克是否有益尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Effect of Methylene Blue on a Porcine Model of Amlodipine Toxicity.
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Oct;16(4):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00780-w. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Efficacy of methylene blue in an experimental model of calcium channel blocker-induced shock.
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
Comparative effectiveness of methylene blue versus intravenous lipid emulsion in a rodent model of amlodipine toxicity.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019 Sep;57(9):784-789. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1560461. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Efficacy of methylene blue in a murine model of amlodipine overdose.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:284-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.077. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
Development and Feasibility of a Porcine Model of Amlodipine Toxicity.
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Jan;16(1):61-66. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00721-2. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Methylene Blue to Treat Protamine-induced Anaphylaxis Reactions. An Experimental Study in Pigs.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):226-231. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160054.
7
Vasodilation in patients with calcium channel blocker poisoning treated with high-dose insulin: a comparison of amlodipine versus non-dihydropyridines.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Nov;60(11):1205-1213. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2131565. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
"Feeling the Blues": A Case of Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose Managed With Methylene Blue.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 29;13(10):e19114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19114. eCollection 2021 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case of Angiotensin II Utilization for Refractory Shock in a Polysubstance Overdose.
J Med Toxicol. 2025 Jul;21(3):350-354. doi: 10.1007/s13181-025-01080-x. Epub 2025 May 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验