Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1445-1450. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04646-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a main cause of fatal complications post-pancreatoduodenectomy. However, no universally accepted drainage management exists for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas. We retrospectively evaluated cases in which drain contrast imaging was used to determine its utility in identifying clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas post-pancreatoduodenectomy.
Between January 2014 and December 2018, 209 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Drain monitoring with contrast imaging was performed in 47 of the cases. We classified drain contrast type into three categories and evaluated postoperative outcome in each group: (1) fistulous tract group-only the fistula was contrasted; (2) fluid collection group - fluid collection connected to the drain fistula; and (3) pancreatico-anastomotic fistula group-fistula connected to the digestive tract.
The durations of postoperative hospital stay and drainage were significantly shorter in the fistulous tract group than in the fluid collection group (31 vs. 46 days, p = 0.0026; and 12 vs. 38 days, p < 0.0001, respectively). The cost and number of drain exchanges were significantly lower in the fistulous tract group than in the fluid collection group ($163.6 vs. 467.5, p < 0.0001; and 1 vs. 5.5, p < 0.0001, respectively). Notably, no patient had grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Classification of prophylactic drain contrast type can aid in predicting outcomes of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas and optimizing drainage management.
术后胰瘘是胰十二指肠切除术后致命并发症的主要原因。然而,对于临床上有意义的术后胰瘘,尚无普遍接受的引流管理方法。我们回顾性评估了使用引流造影来确定其在胰十二指肠切除术后识别临床上有意义的术后胰瘘的作用。
在 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,对我院 209 例连续接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析。在 47 例患者中进行了引流监测造影。我们将引流造影类型分为三类,并评估了每组患者的术后结果:(1)瘘管组-仅瘘管被造影;(2)积液组-积液与引流瘘管相连;(3)胰肠吻合口瘘组-瘘管与消化道相连。
与积液组相比,瘘管组的术后住院时间和引流时间明显更短(31 天 vs. 46 天,p=0.0026;12 天 vs. 38 天,p<0.0001)。瘘管组的费用和引流管更换次数也明显低于积液组(163.6 美元 vs. 467.5 美元,p<0.0001;1 次 vs. 5.5 次,p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,没有患者发生 C 级术后胰瘘。
预防性引流造影类型的分类有助于预测临床上有意义的术后胰瘘的结果,并优化引流管理。