Suppr超能文献

替氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶联合贝伐珠单抗治疗不适合强化治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者:随机 TASCO1 研究。

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study.

机构信息

University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Szpitale Wojewodzkie w Gdyni/Gdansk Medical University, Gdynia, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1160-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 29 April 2016 to 29 March 2017, 153 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either TT-B (N = 77) or C-B (N = 76). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The primary PFS analysis was performed after 100 events (radiological progression or death) were observed. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL; QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires), and safety.

RESULTS

Median (range) duration of treatment was 7.8 (6.0-9.7) months and 6.2 (4.1-9.1) months in the TT-B and C-B groups, respectively. Median (range) PFS was 9.2 (7.6-11.6) and 7.8 (5.5-10.1) months, respectively. Median (range) OS was 18 (15.2 to NA) and 16.2 (12.5 to NA) months, respectively. QoL questionnaires showed no relevant changes over time for either treatment. Therapies were well tolerated. Patients receiving TT-B had more grade ≥3 neutropenia (47% versus 5% with C-B). Patients receiving C-B had more grade ≥3 hand-foot syndrome (12% versus 0% with TT-B) and grade ≥3 diarrhea (8% versus 1% with TT-B), consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents.

CONCLUSION

TT-B treatment showed promising clinical activity in untreated patients with unresectable mCRC ineligible for intensive therapy, with an acceptable safety profile and no clinically relevant changes in QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT02743221 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

摘要

背景

我们设计了一项开放标签、非对照的 II 期研究,旨在评估一线治疗在不可切除的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中的安全性和疗效,这些患者未经治疗且不适合联合细胞毒性化疗。

患者和方法

从 2016 年 4 月 29 日至 2017 年 3 月 29 日,153 名患者被随机分配(1:1)至 TT-B(N=77)或 C-B(N=76)组。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。在观察到 100 个事件(影像学进展或死亡)后进行主要的 PFS 分析。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、生活质量(QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-CR29 问卷)和安全性。

结果

治疗的中位(范围)持续时间分别为 TT-B 组 7.8(6.0-9.7)个月和 C-B 组 6.2(4.1-9.1)个月。TT-B 组和 C-B 组的中位(范围)PFS 分别为 9.2(7.6-11.6)和 7.8(5.5-10.1)个月。中位(范围)OS 分别为 18(15.2 至无)和 16.2(12.5 至无)个月。两种治疗方法的 QoL 问卷均未显示随时间的相关变化。治疗耐受性良好。接受 TT-B 治疗的患者中性粒细胞减少症≥3 级(47%与 C-B 组的 5%)更为常见。接受 C-B 治疗的患者手足综合征≥3 级(12%与 TT-B 组的 0%)和腹泻≥3 级(8%与 TT-B 组的 1%)更为常见,这与这些药物的已知安全性特征一致。

结论

TT-B 治疗在不适合强化治疗的不可切除 mCRC 患者中表现出有希望的临床活性,具有可接受的安全性,且生活质量无临床相关变化。

临床试验信息

NCT02743221(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验