Suppr超能文献

从骨骼遗骸中进行 DNA 分型:毛细管电泳与大规模平行测序平台的比较。

DNA typing from skeletal remains: a comparison between capillary electrophoresis and massively parallel sequencing platforms.

机构信息

Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

Int J Legal Med. 2020 Nov;134(6):2029-2035. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02327-8. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

Skeletal remains encountered frequently in forensic applications are a challenging specimen, since their DNA is usually degraded due to harsh conditions, limiting the utilization of skeletal DNA. Forensic scientists have tried various methods to extract DNA from skeletal remains of low quantity and poor quality or improve detecting technology for more information from compromised DNA. Compared with traditional capillary electrophoresis (CE), massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is more sensitive to shorter fragments, able to detect allele sequences for variations from core motif or flanking regions, and able to detect more markers with a higher discrimination power. In this study, short tandem repeats (STR) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from 35 human skeletons were genotyped by MPS platform, and CE method was also used to perform STR genotyping. The results indicated that the detection rates reached 100.00% in 16 of 35 samples with MPS method, while the same 100.00% was reached in only 9 samples with CE. The success rates of MPS were also higher than that of CE method in shared 21 loci (excluding Y-indel, DYS391, and SE33), especially in loci detected by MPS method only. Besides, all SNPs (124 and 90 SNPs in males and females) were detected in 18 samples of 35 samples by MPS method. Some intra-allelic sequence variants were observed in eight loci (D21S11, D8S1179, D5S2800, D3S1358, vWA, D2S1338, D1S1656, D12S391) using MPS technology. Interestingly, there is a sample showing genotyping disagreement in FGA locus. The clone sequencing verified that a "T" deletion discovered in flanking sequence of FGA led to wrong genotyping on Ampliseq Converge. Our results indicated that MPS could be adopted in qualified labs as a supplementary when the DNA of skeletal remains are hard to identify.

摘要

在法医应用中经常遇到的骨骼遗骸是一种具有挑战性的样本,因为它们的 DNA 通常由于恶劣的条件而降解,从而限制了骨骼 DNA 的利用。法医科学家尝试了各种方法从低数量和低质量的骨骼遗骸中提取 DNA,或者改进检测技术以从受损 DNA 中获取更多信息。与传统的毛细管电泳 (CE) 相比,大规模平行测序 (MPS) 对更短的片段更敏感,能够检测核心模体或侧翼区域的变异等位基因序列,并能够检测更多具有更高鉴别力的标记。在这项研究中,使用 MPS 平台对 35 个人骨的短串联重复序列 (STR) 和单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 进行了基因分型,同时还使用 CE 方法进行了 STR 基因分型。结果表明,MPS 方法在 35 个样本中的 16 个样本中达到了 100.00%的检测率,而 CE 方法仅在 9 个样本中达到了相同的 100.00%。MPS 的成功率也高于 CE 方法在 21 个共享基因座(排除 Y-插入缺失、DYS391 和 SE33)中的成功率,特别是在仅由 MPS 方法检测到的基因座中。此外,通过 MPS 方法在 35 个样本中的 18 个样本中检测到所有 SNP(男性和女性各 124 和 90 个 SNP)。在使用 MPS 技术的八个基因座(D21S11、D8S1179、D5S2800、D3S1358、vWA、D2S1338、D1S1656、D12S391)中观察到一些等位基因内序列变异。有趣的是,有一个样本在 FGA 基因座显示出基因分型不一致。克隆测序证实,在 FGA 侧翼序列中发现的“T”缺失导致 Ampliseq Converge 上的错误基因分型。我们的结果表明,在难以识别骨骼遗骸 DNA 的情况下,MPS 可以在合格的实验室中作为补充方法采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验