From the Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2020 Sep 1;41(5):326-335. doi: 10.2500/aap.2020.41.200047. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy is a potential novel immunotherapy that utilizes the unique cutaneous immunologic properties to induce desensitization. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (PEPITES) in peanut-allergic children 4-11 years demonstrated an epicutaneous patch (DBV712) with 250 µg peanut protein was statistically superior to placebo in inducing desensitization following 12 months of daily treatment. To investigate what baseline and in-study factors influenced response to DBV712 250 µg, with a focus on patch adhesion, by posthoc analysis of PEPITES data. A posthoc multivariate model built with log-transformed Month 12 eliciting dose (ED) as the dependent variable was used to assess the influence of baseline characteristics and patch adhesion. Baseline characteristics and treatment response were also evaluated by stratifying subjects into decile subgroups by patch detachment rates over the 12-month study. Multivariate analysis identified higher baseline ED and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE as the variables most predictive of higher Month 12 ED, followed by mean daily patch application duration, baseline SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score, and age. By decile stratification, no association between patch detachment and treatment response was identified for 80% of DBV712-treated subjects. All DBV712-treated subjects, including those with the highest patch detachment rates, demonstrated treatment benefit measured by fold-changes in geometric mean ED. We identified subject baseline characteristics of higher baseline ED and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE as most predictive of higher Month 12 ED. For the majority of treated subjects, patch detachment did not impact treatment response. A minority of subjects, highly sensitive to peanut at baseline, had lower prespecified responder rates and higher patch detachment rates, yet still benefited from treatment based upon fold-changes in ED.
经皮免疫治疗(EPIT)治疗花生过敏是一种潜在的新型免疫治疗方法,利用皮肤独特的免疫特性来诱导脱敏。一项针对 4-11 岁花生过敏儿童的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验(PEPITES)表明,在 12 个月的每日治疗后,与安慰剂相比,含有 250μg 花生蛋白的经皮贴片(DBV712)在诱导脱敏方面具有统计学优势。为了研究哪些基线和研究期间的因素会影响 DBV712 250μg 的反应,通过 PEPITES 数据的事后分析来关注贴片粘附。使用对数转换的第 12 个月激发剂量(ED)作为因变量的事后多变量模型,用于评估基线特征和贴片粘附的影响。还通过将研究期间的贴片脱落率分为十等份亚组来评估基线特征和治疗反应。多变量分析确定较高的基线 ED 和较低的基线花生特异性 IgE 是预测第 12 个月 ED 较高的最具预测性变量,其次是平均每日贴片应用持续时间、基线 SCORing 特应性皮炎(SCORAD)评分和年龄。通过十等分组分层,80%的 DBV712 治疗受试者中,贴片脱落与治疗反应之间没有关联。所有 DBV712 治疗受试者,包括贴片脱落率最高的受试者,均表现出治疗获益,表现为几何均数 ED 的变化倍数。我们确定了受试者的基线特征,即较高的基线 ED 和较低的基线花生特异性 IgE,这些特征最能预测第 12 个月的 ED。对于大多数接受治疗的受试者,贴片脱落不会影响治疗反应。少数基线对花生高度敏感的受试者,其预设的应答率较低,贴片脱落率较高,但仍基于 ED 的变化倍数从治疗中受益。