Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):777-782. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016261. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
Ruptured aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery (VA) or posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are challenging to treat as they are often dissecting aneurysms necessitating direct sacrifice of the diseased segment, which is thought to carry high morbidity due to brainstem and cerebellar stroke. However, relatively few studies evaluating outcomes following VA or proximal PICA sacrifice exist. We sought to determine the efficacy and outcomes of endovascular VA/PICA sacrifice.
A retrospective series of ruptured VA/PICA aneurysms treated by endovascular sacrifice of the VA (including the PICA origin) or proximal PICA is reviewed. Collected data included demographic, radiologic, clinical, and disability information.
Twenty-one patients were identified. Median age was 57 years (IQR 11); 15 were female. The Hunt and Hess grade was mostly 3 and 4 (18/21). Seven cases (33%) involved VA-V4 at the PICA take-off, and 14 cases (67%) involved the PICA exclusively. For VA pathology, V4 was sacrificed in all cases, while for PICA pathology, sacrificed segments included anterior medullary (4/14), lateral medullary (7/14), and tonsillomedullary (3/14) segments. Four patients went to hospice (19%). Twelve patients (57%) had evidence of stroke on follow-up imaging: cerebellar (8), medullary (1), and both (3). One patient required suboccipital decompression for brainstem compression. No aneurysm re-rupture occurred. Median discharge modified Rankin Scale score was 2.0 (IQR 2), which decreased to 1.0 (IQR 1) at median follow-up of 6.5 months (IQR 23).
Endovascular sacrifice of V4 or PICA aneurysms may carry less morbidity than previously thought, and is a viable alternative for poor surgical candidates or those with good collateral perfusion.
颅内椎动脉(VA)或小脑后下动脉(PICA)破裂动脉瘤的治疗具有挑战性,因为它们通常是夹层动脉瘤,需要直接牺牲病变节段,这被认为由于脑干和小脑中风而发病率较高。然而,评估 VA 或近端 PICA 牺牲后结果的研究相对较少。我们旨在确定血管内 VA/PICA 牺牲的疗效和结果。
回顾性分析了 21 例接受血管内 VA(包括 PICA 起源)或近端 PICA 牺牲治疗的破裂 VA/PICA 动脉瘤患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、影像学、临床和残疾信息。
确定了 21 例患者。中位年龄为 57 岁(IQR 11);15 例为女性。Hunt 和 Hess 分级主要为 3 级和 4 级(18/21)。7 例(33%)涉及 PICA 起始处的 VA-V4,14 例(67%)仅涉及 PICA。对于 VA 病变,所有病例均牺牲 V4,而对于 PICA 病变,牺牲的节段包括前髓质(4/14)、外侧髓质(7/14)和扁桃体髓质(3/14)。4 例患者(19%)进入临终关怀。12 例患者(57%)在随访影像学上有中风证据:小脑(8)、髓质(1)和两者均有(3)。1 例患者因脑干受压而行枕下减压术。无动脉瘤再破裂发生。出院时改良 Rankin 量表评分为 2.0(IQR 2),中位随访 6.5 个月(IQR 23)时降至 1.0(IQR 1)。
血管内牺牲 V4 或 PICA 动脉瘤的发病率可能低于先前认为的,对于手术条件差的患者或具有良好侧支灌注的患者,这是一种可行的替代方法。