Impact of Temporal Artery Biopsy on Clinical Management of Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis.

BACKGROUND

Temporal arteritis (TA) is a systemic inflammatory vasculitis of unclear etiology that affects medium-sized vessels. The gold standard for diagnosis has traditionally been histological, by temporal artery biopsy. Improved imaging modalities have been increasingly used to aid diagnosis and are recommended in the newest 2018 European (EULAR) guidelines. We hypothesize that a negative TA biopsy result does not change management in patients for whom TA is strongly suspected and that duplex ultrasound can be successfully used as a screening tool.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent TA biopsy between May 1, 2012 and June 1, 2017. We reviewed patient's demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, histology, and treatment. We also present a small series of patients for whom ultrasound of the bilateral temporal arteries was performed. Radiology and pathology reports on these 7 patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients underwent temporal artery biopsies over the study period. Histology was positive in 21 (8.0%) and negative in 243 (92%) patients. In 74 (41%) patients with negative biopsies on steroids preoperatively, steroids were continued despite negative biopsy result. In prospective series, 7 patients underwent duplex ultrasound evaluation before scheduling for biopsy. Biopsy followed ultrasound in 4 cases, and in all 4 cases, histology was congruent with ultrasound findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The yield of temporal artery biopsy is low, and a negative biopsy alone often does not lead to termination of steroid therapy. Ultrasound may present a viable diagnostic tool to reduce the number of unnecessary temporal artery biopsies performed.