Suppr超能文献

不同供体在创伤性臂丛神经损伤中应用时的力量疲劳差异。

Differences in strength fatigue when using different donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

机构信息

Peripheral Nerve & Brachial Plexus Surgery Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Clinicas, University of Buenos Aires School of Medicine, 1175 Torre 2 5A, 1428, Buenos Aires, La Pampa, Argentina.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Aug;162(8):1913-1919. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04454-y. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the results of elbow flexion strength fatigue, rather than the maximal power of strength, after brachial plexus re-innervation with phrenic and spinal accessory nerves. We designed a simple but specific test to study whether statistical differences were observed among those two donor nerves.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe brachial plexus palsy for which either phrenic nerve (PN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer was performed. A dynamometer was used to determine the maximal contraction strength. One and two kilograms circular weights were utilized to measure isometrically the duration of submaximal and near-maximal contraction time. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with a PN transfer while 7 with a SAN transfer for elbow flexion. The mean time from trauma to surgery was 7.1 months for spinal accessory nerve versus 5.2 for phrenic nerve, and the mean follow-up was 57.7 and 38.6 months, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a quicker fatigue for the PN, such that patients with the SAN transfer could hold weights of 1 kg and 2 kg for a mean of 91.0 and 61.6 s, respectively, while patients with transfer of the phrenic nerve could hold 1 kg and 2 kg weights for just a mean of 41.7 and 19.6 s, respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (at p = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). Upon correlation analysis, endurances at 1 kg and 2 kg were strongly correlated, with r = 0.85 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that phrenic to musculocutaneous nerve transfer showed an increased muscular fatigue when compared with spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous transfer. Further studies designed to analyze this relation should be performed to increase our knowledge about strength endurance/fatigue and muscle re-innervation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估膈神经和副神经臂丛再神经支配后肘部屈肌力量疲劳而非最大力量的结果。我们设计了一种简单但特定的测试来研究这两种供体神经之间是否观察到统计学差异。

方法

我们回顾性分析了因严重臂丛神经损伤而行膈神经(PN)或副神经(SAN)至肌皮神经(MCN)转移的患者。使用测力计确定最大收缩力。使用 1 公斤和 2 公斤圆形砝码来测量亚最大和近最大收缩时间的等长持续时间。对两组进行统计学分析。

结果

共纳入 28 例患者:21 例接受 PN 转移,7 例接受 SAN 转移以进行肘部弯曲。副神经的创伤至手术时间平均为 7.1 个月,膈神经为 5.2 个月,平均随访时间分别为 57.7 和 38.6 个月。统计分析显示 PN 的疲劳更快,因此接受 SAN 转移的患者可以分别保持 1 公斤和 2 公斤的重量 91.0 和 61.6 秒,而接受膈神经转移的患者只能分别保持 1 公斤和 2 公斤的重量 41.7 和 19.6 秒。这两个差异均具有统计学意义(p = 0.006 和 0.011)。相关性分析显示,1 公斤和 2 公斤的耐力呈强相关性,r = 0.85(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与副神经至肌皮神经转移相比,膈神经至肌皮神经转移显示出增加的肌肉疲劳。应该进行进一步的研究来分析这种关系,以增加我们对力量耐力/疲劳和肌肉再神经支配的了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验