University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Clin Dermatol. 2020 May-Jun;38(3):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Recently, dermatology group practice ownership structures have changed, as private equity (PE) consolidates independent dermatology practices to create larger groups. Currently, little is known about how dermatology residents perceive practice ownership structures, including those that are owned by PE. One hundred thirty-seven residents from 32 dermatology residency programs responded to a 21-question anonymous survey. Approximately 65% of residents in this study were not open to working for PE-backed practices, and their negative perceptions of how PE influences quality of care, long-term salary, and physician autonomy were associated with their unwillingness to work at a PE-backed practice. Most residents in this study valued education about practice ownership structures, and approximately 43% of respondents did not feel adequately informed about practice options during residency. Future studies should evaluate how PE ownership of group practices influences practice parameters, including quality of patient care, physician autonomy, and long-term salary.
最近,皮肤科集团实践的所有权结构发生了变化,因为私募股权(PE)整合了独立的皮肤科实践,以创建更大的集团。目前,对于皮肤科住院医师如何看待实践所有权结构,包括那些由 PE 拥有的实践所有权结构,人们知之甚少。来自 32 个皮肤科住院医师培训项目的 137 名住院医师对一份 21 个问题的匿名调查做出了回应。在这项研究中,大约 65%的住院医师对为 PE 支持的实践工作持开放态度,他们对 PE 如何影响医疗质量、长期薪酬和医生自主权的负面看法与他们不愿意在 PE 支持的实践中工作有关。在这项研究中,大多数住院医师重视有关实践所有权结构的教育,大约 43%的受访者表示在住院期间对实践选择没有足够的了解。未来的研究应该评估集团实践中 PE 所有权如何影响实践参数,包括患者护理质量、医生自主权和长期薪酬。