Suppr超能文献

急诊科安全评估和后续评估 2:一项旨在改善自杀预防的实施试验。

Emergency department safety assessment and follow-up evaluation 2: An implementation trial to improve suicide prevention.

机构信息

Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106075. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106075. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are important for preventing suicide. Historically, many patients with suicide risk are not detected during routine clinical care, and those who are often do not receive suicide-specific intervention. The original Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE 1) study examined the implementation of universal suicide risk screening and a multi-component ED-initiated suicide prevention intervention.

PURPOSE

The ED-SAFE 2 aims to study the impact of using a continuous quality improvement approach (CQI) to improve suicide related care, with a focus on improving universal suicide risk screening in adult ED patients and evaluating implementation of a new brief intervention called the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) into routine clinical practice. CQI is a quality management process that uses data and collaboration to drive incremental, iterative improvements. The SPI is a personalized approach that focuses on early identification of warning signs and execution of systematic steps to manage suicidal thoughts. ED-SAFE 2 will provide data on the effectiveness of CQI procedures in improving suicide-related care processes, as well as the impact of these improvements on reducing suicide-related outcomes.

METHODS

Using a stepped wedge design, eight EDs collected data cross three study phases: Baseline (retrospective), Implementation (12 months), and Maintenance (12 months). Lean methods, a specific approach to pursuing CQI which focuses on increasing value and eliminating waste, were used to evaluate and improve suicide-related care.

CONCLUSIONS

The results will build upon the success of the ED-SAFE 1 and will have a broad public health impact through promoting better suicide-related care processes and improved suicide prevention.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)在预防自杀方面发挥着重要作用。历史上,许多有自杀风险的患者在常规临床护理中未被发现,而那些被发现的患者往往未接受专门针对自杀的干预。最初的急诊安全评估和随访评估(ED-SAFE1)研究考察了实施普遍的自杀风险筛查和多组分 ED 启动的自杀预防干预的情况。

目的

ED-SAFE2 旨在研究使用持续质量改进方法(CQI)来改善与自杀相关的护理的效果,重点是改进成年 ED 患者的普遍自杀风险筛查,并评估将新的简短干预措施安全计划干预(SPI)纳入常规临床实践的情况。CQI 是一种质量管理过程,它使用数据和协作来推动渐进式、迭代式的改进。SPI 是一种个性化方法,重点关注早期识别警告信号并执行系统步骤来管理自杀念头。ED-SAFE2 将提供关于 CQI 程序在改善与自杀相关的护理流程方面的有效性的数据,以及这些改进对减少与自杀相关的结果的影响的数据。

方法

使用阶梯式楔形设计,8 家 ED 在三个研究阶段(基线(回顾性)、实施(12 个月)和维持(12 个月))收集数据。精益方法,一种专门用于追求 CQI 的方法,侧重于增加价值和消除浪费,被用于评估和改善与自杀相关的护理。

结论

这些结果将建立在 ED-SAFE1 的成功基础上,并通过促进更好的与自杀相关的护理流程和改进的自杀预防,产生广泛的公共卫生影响。

相似文献

1
Emergency department safety assessment and follow-up evaluation 2: An implementation trial to improve suicide prevention.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106075. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106075. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
4
Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 22.
7
Screening and Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the ED-SAFE Interventions.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Dec 1;70(12):1082-1087. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800445. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678.

引用本文的文献

3
Implementation strategies in suicide prevention: a scoping review.
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 26;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01350-2.
6
Studying the implementation of Zero Suicide in a large health system: Challenges, adaptations, and lessons learned.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Sep 17;30:100999. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100999. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
National estimates of emergency department visits for medication-related self-harm: United States, 2016-2019.
Inj Prev. 2022 Dec;28(6):545-552. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044620. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678.
3
Detecting and treating suicide ideation in all settings.
Sentinel Event Alert. 2016 Feb 24(56):1-7.
4
Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
The patient safety screener: validation of a brief suicide risk screener for emergency department settings.
Arch Suicide Res. 2015;19(2):151-60. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1034604.
7
Health care contacts in the year before suicide death.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):870-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2767-3. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Unexpected suicidality in an older individual in an emergency department.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jun;61(6):1044-1045. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12290.
10
The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验