• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科安全评估和后续评估 2:一项旨在改善自杀预防的实施试验。

Emergency department safety assessment and follow-up evaluation 2: An implementation trial to improve suicide prevention.

机构信息

Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106075. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106075. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2020.106075
PMID:32565041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7484364/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are important for preventing suicide. Historically, many patients with suicide risk are not detected during routine clinical care, and those who are often do not receive suicide-specific intervention. The original Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE 1) study examined the implementation of universal suicide risk screening and a multi-component ED-initiated suicide prevention intervention.

PURPOSE

The ED-SAFE 2 aims to study the impact of using a continuous quality improvement approach (CQI) to improve suicide related care, with a focus on improving universal suicide risk screening in adult ED patients and evaluating implementation of a new brief intervention called the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) into routine clinical practice. CQI is a quality management process that uses data and collaboration to drive incremental, iterative improvements. The SPI is a personalized approach that focuses on early identification of warning signs and execution of systematic steps to manage suicidal thoughts. ED-SAFE 2 will provide data on the effectiveness of CQI procedures in improving suicide-related care processes, as well as the impact of these improvements on reducing suicide-related outcomes.

METHODS

Using a stepped wedge design, eight EDs collected data cross three study phases: Baseline (retrospective), Implementation (12 months), and Maintenance (12 months). Lean methods, a specific approach to pursuing CQI which focuses on increasing value and eliminating waste, were used to evaluate and improve suicide-related care.

CONCLUSIONS

The results will build upon the success of the ED-SAFE 1 and will have a broad public health impact through promoting better suicide-related care processes and improved suicide prevention.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)在预防自杀方面发挥着重要作用。历史上,许多有自杀风险的患者在常规临床护理中未被发现,而那些被发现的患者往往未接受专门针对自杀的干预。最初的急诊安全评估和随访评估(ED-SAFE1)研究考察了实施普遍的自杀风险筛查和多组分 ED 启动的自杀预防干预的情况。

目的

ED-SAFE2 旨在研究使用持续质量改进方法(CQI)来改善与自杀相关的护理的效果,重点是改进成年 ED 患者的普遍自杀风险筛查,并评估将新的简短干预措施安全计划干预(SPI)纳入常规临床实践的情况。CQI 是一种质量管理过程,它使用数据和协作来推动渐进式、迭代式的改进。SPI 是一种个性化方法,重点关注早期识别警告信号并执行系统步骤来管理自杀念头。ED-SAFE2 将提供关于 CQI 程序在改善与自杀相关的护理流程方面的有效性的数据,以及这些改进对减少与自杀相关的结果的影响的数据。

方法

使用阶梯式楔形设计,8 家 ED 在三个研究阶段(基线(回顾性)、实施(12 个月)和维持(12 个月))收集数据。精益方法,一种专门用于追求 CQI 的方法,侧重于增加价值和消除浪费,被用于评估和改善与自杀相关的护理。

结论

这些结果将建立在 ED-SAFE1 的成功基础上,并通过促进更好的与自杀相关的护理流程和改进的自杀预防,产生广泛的公共卫生影响。

相似文献

1
Emergency department safety assessment and follow-up evaluation 2: An implementation trial to improve suicide prevention.急诊科安全评估和后续评估 2:一项旨在改善自杀预防的实施试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106075. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106075. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Effect of an Emergency Department Process Improvement Package on Suicide Prevention: The ED-SAFE 2 Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊部流程改进方案对预防自杀的效果:ED-SAFE 2 集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):665-674. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1304.
3
Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department.比较安全规划干预与常规随访对急诊科治疗的自杀患者的影响。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):894-900. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776.
4
Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.改善急诊科的自杀风险筛查与检测
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations.急诊科安全评估和随访评估(ED-SAFE):方法和设计考虑因素。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
Safety planning intervention and follow-up: A telehealth service model for suicidal individuals in emergency department settings: Study design and protocol.安全规划干预与随访:急诊科自杀患者的远程医疗服务模式:研究设计与方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107492. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Screening and Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the ED-SAFE Interventions.自杀预防的筛查和干预:ED-SAFE 干预措施的成本效益分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Dec 1;70(12):1082-1087. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800445. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study.急诊科人群中的自杀预防:急诊安全研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678.
9
A Suicide Prevention Digital Technology for Individuals Experiencing an Acute Suicide Crisis in Emergency Departments: Naturalistic Observational Study of Real-World Acceptability, Feasibility, and Safety.一种用于急诊科急性自杀危机患者的自杀预防数字技术:对现实世界可接受性、可行性和安全性的自然观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 16;8:e52293. doi: 10.2196/52293.
10
Comparative effectiveness of safety planning intervention with instrumental support calls (ISC) versus safety planning intervention with two-way text message caring contacts (CC) in adolescents and adults screening positive for suicide risk in emergency departments and primary care clinics: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.在急诊室和初级保健诊所中对筛查出有自杀风险的青少年和成年人进行安全计划干预与仪器支持电话(ISC)比较,以及安全计划干预与双向短信关怀联系(CC)的比较:一项实用随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;131:107268. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107268. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Health Care Provider Experiences With Suicide-Related Tele-Mental Health Evaluations in the Emergency Department: Multiphase Qualitative Study.患者及医疗服务提供者在急诊科进行自杀相关远程心理健康评估的体验:多阶段定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jun 26;12:e72541. doi: 10.2196/72541.
2
Classifying Unstructured Text in Electronic Health Records for Mental Health Prediction Models: Large Language Model Evaluation Study.用于心理健康预测模型的电子健康记录中非结构化文本分类:大语言模型评估研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jan 21;13:e65454. doi: 10.2196/65454.
3
Implementation strategies in suicide prevention: a scoping review.预防自杀的实施策略:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 26;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01350-2.
4
Effects of Community-Based Caring Contact in Reducing Thwarted Belongingness Among Postdischarge Young Adults With Self-Harm: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于社区的关爱接触对减少出院后有自我伤害行为的年轻人的归属感缺失的影响:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 16;7:e43526. doi: 10.2196/43526.
5
ReachCare Mobile Apps for Patients Experiencing Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Development and Usability Testing Using Mixed Methods.急诊科有自杀倾向患者的ReachCare移动应用程序:采用混合方法进行开发和可用性测试
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 27;7:e41422. doi: 10.2196/41422.
6
Studying the implementation of Zero Suicide in a large health system: Challenges, adaptations, and lessons learned.研究大型医疗系统中零自杀的实施情况:挑战、调整及经验教训。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Sep 17;30:100999. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100999. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
National estimates of emergency department visits for medication-related self-harm: United States, 2016-2019.国家估计因药物相关自伤而到急诊就诊的人数:美国,2016-2019 年。
Inj Prev. 2022 Dec;28(6):545-552. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044620. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
8
Comparing the predictive value of screening to the use of electronic health record data for detecting future suicidal thoughts and behavior in an urban pediatric emergency department: A preliminary analysis.比较筛查与使用电子健康记录数据在城市儿科急诊中预测未来自杀想法和行为的预测价值:一项初步分析。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1189-1202. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12800. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department.比较安全规划干预与常规随访对急诊科治疗的自杀患者的影响。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):894-900. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776.
2
Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study.急诊科人群中的自杀预防:急诊安全研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678.
3
Detecting and treating suicide ideation in all settings.在所有环境中检测和治疗自杀意念。
Sentinel Event Alert. 2016 Feb 24(56):1-7.
4
Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.改善急诊科的自杀风险筛查与检测
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
The patient safety screener: validation of a brief suicide risk screener for emergency department settings.患者安全筛查工具:急诊科环境中简短自杀风险筛查工具的验证
Arch Suicide Res. 2015;19(2):151-60. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1034604.
6
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting.阶梯楔形整群随机试验:原理、设计、分析与报告
BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391.
7
Health care contacts in the year before suicide death.自杀死亡前一年的医疗接触情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):870-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2767-3. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
8
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.动态可持续性框架:应对持续变化中的维持悖论。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 2;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
9
Unexpected suicidality in an older individual in an emergency department.急诊科一名老年患者出现意外自杀倾向。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jun;61(6):1044-1045. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12290.
10
The Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE): method and design considerations.急诊科安全评估和随访评估(ED-SAFE):方法和设计考虑因素。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 22.