Fletcher Ashley, Lassere Marissa, March Lyn, Hill Catherine, Carroll Graeme, Barrett Claire, Buchbinder Rachelle
Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Rheumatol. 2020 Jun 5;2020:6542965. doi: 10.1155/2020/6542965. eCollection 2020.
OBJECTIVES: To describe oral complementary medicine (CM) use in people with inflammatory arthritis, associations with use, and changes in use over time. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome data from 5,630 participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) were extracted from the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD), a national observational database. CM use at entry into ARAD was ascertained for participants recruited between 2002 and 2018. CM was categorised according to the NIH/Cochrane schema (fatty acids, herbs, or supplements). Logistic regression was used to assess associations between demographic characteristics and CM use. Change in CM use between 2006 and 2016 was investigated using a nonparametric test for trend of rate by year. RESULTS: 2,156 (38.3%) ARAD participants were taking CM at enrolment (RA: 1,502/3,960 (37.9%), AS: 281/736 (38.2%), PsA: 334/749 (44.6%), and JIA: 39/185 (21.1%)). CM use was more prevalent in women (OR 1.3; 95% CI: 1.13-1.50), those with tertiary education (OR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.13-1.55), private health insurance (OR 1.26; (95% CI: 1.10-1.44), drinking alcohol sometimes (OR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05-1.43), poorer function (HAQ) (OR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.24), use of NSAID (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.17-1.50), weak (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.05-1.41) but not strong opioids, and less prevalent in current smokers (OR 0.76; 95%: CI 0.63-0.91). CM use was not associated with pain, disease activity, or quality of life. The most common CMs were fish oils ( = 1,489 users) followed by glucosamine ( = 605). Both declined in use over time between 2006 and 2016 (27.5% to 21.4%, trend = 0.85 and 15.5% to 6.4%, trend < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral CM use is common among Australians with inflammatory arthritis. Its use is greater among women and those with tertiary education. Fish oil and glucosamine, the most common CMs, both declined in use over time.
目的:描述炎症性关节炎患者使用口服补充和替代医学(CM)的情况、与使用相关的因素以及随时间推移的使用变化。 方法:从澳大利亚风湿病协会数据库(ARAD)(一个全国性观察数据库)中提取5630名类风湿关节炎(RA)、强直性脊柱炎(AS)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)患者的人口统计学、临床和患者报告结局数据。确定了2002年至2018年招募的参与者进入ARAD时使用CM的情况。CM根据美国国立卫生研究院/考克兰分类法(脂肪酸、草药或补充剂)进行分类。使用逻辑回归评估人口统计学特征与CM使用之间的关联。使用非参数逐年率趋势检验研究2006年至2016年期间CM使用的变化。 结果:2156名(38.3%)ARAD参与者在入组时正在使用CM(RA:1502/3960(37.9%),AS:281/736(38.2%),PsA:334/749(44.6%),JIA:39/185(21.1%))。CM在女性(比值比1.3;95%置信区间:1.13 - 1.50)、受过高等教育者(比值比1.32;95%置信区间:1.13 - 1.55)、拥有私人医疗保险者(比值比1.26;95%置信区间:1.10 - 1.44)、有时饮酒者(比值比1.22;95%置信区间:1.05 - 1.43)、功能较差(健康评估问卷)者(比值比1.13;95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.24)、使用非甾体抗炎药者(比值比1.32;95%置信区间1.17 - 1.50)、使用弱(而非强)阿片类药物者(比值比1.21;95%置信区间1.05 - 1.41)中使用更为普遍,而在当前吸烟者中使用不太普遍(比值比0.76;95%置信区间:0.63 - 0.91)。CM的使用与疼痛、疾病活动度或生活质量无关。最常用的CM是鱼油(1489名使用者),其次是氨基葡萄糖(605名使用者)。在2006年至2016年期间,两者的使用均随时间下降(分别从27.5%降至21.4%,趋势P = 0.85;从15.5%降至6.4%,趋势P < 0.01)。 结论:口服CM在患有炎症性关节炎的澳大利亚人中很常见。女性和受过高等教育者的使用更为普遍。最常用的CM鱼油和氨基葡萄糖的使用均随时间下降。
Intern Med J. 2018-11
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018-8-7
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014-3
Biomolecules. 2022-2-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-8
Complement Ther Med. 2016-12
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-7-17