• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模蒙特卡罗剂量重建用于肺机器人立体定向体部放射治疗的剂量学评估。

Large-scale dosimetric assessment of Monte Carlo recalculated doses for lung robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy.

机构信息

Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.

Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2020 Aug;76:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.006
PMID:32569954
Abstract

Owing to its short computation time and simplicity, the Ray-Tracing algorithm (RAT) has long been used to calculate dose distributions for the CyberKnife system. However, it is known that RAT fails to fully account for tissue heterogeneity and is therefore inaccurate in the lung. The aim of this study is to make a dosimetric assessment of 219 non-small cell lung cancer CyberKnife plans by recalculating their dose distributions using an independent Monte Carlo (MC) method. For plans initially calculated by RAT without heterogeneity corrections, target coverage was found to be significantly compromised when considering MC doses. Only 35.4% of plans were found to comply to their prescription doses. If the normal tissue dose limits were respected in the treatment planning dose, the MC recalculated dose did not exceed these limits in over 97% of the plans. Comparison of RAT and recalculated-MC doses confirmed the overestimation of RAT doses observed in previous studies. An inverse correlation between the RAT/MC dose ratio and the target size was also found to be statistically significant (p<10), consistent with other studies. In addition, the inaccuracy and variability in target coverage incurred from dose calculations using RAT without heterogeneity corrections was demonstrated. On average, no clinically relevant differences were observed between MC-calculated dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for all tissues investigated (⩽1%). Patients receiving a dose D larger than 119 Gy in EQD2 (or ≈52 Gy in 3 fractions) as recalculated by MC were observed to have significantly superior loco-regional progression-free survival rates (p=0.02) with a hazard ratio of 3.45 (95%CI: 1.14-10.5).

摘要

由于其计算时间短且简单,光线追踪算法(RAT)长期以来一直用于计算 CyberKnife 系统的剂量分布。然而,众所周知,RAT 未能充分考虑组织异质性,因此在肺部不够准确。本研究的目的是通过使用独立的蒙特卡罗(MC)方法重新计算其剂量分布,对 219 例非小细胞肺癌 CyberKnife 计划进行剂量评估。对于最初未进行异质性校正的 RAT 计算的计划,考虑 MC 剂量时,发现靶区覆盖率显著降低。只有 35.4%的计划符合其处方剂量。如果在治疗计划剂量中遵守正常组织剂量限制,则超过 97%的计划中 MC 重新计算的剂量不会超过这些限制。RAT 和重新计算的 MC 剂量之间的比较证实了之前研究中观察到的 RAT 剂量高估。还发现 RAT/MC 剂量比与靶区大小之间存在显著的负相关(p<10),与其他研究一致。此外,还证明了不进行异质性校正的 RAT 剂量计算导致靶区覆盖的不准确和变化。平均而言,对于所有研究的组织,MC 计算的水剂量与介质剂量之间没有观察到临床相关的差异(⩽1%)。接受 MC 重新计算的剂量 D 大于 119 Gy 的等效剂量(EQD2)(或 3 个部分的 ≈52 Gy)的患者,其局部区域无进展生存率显著提高(p=0.02),危险比为 3.45(95%CI:1.14-10.5)。

相似文献

1
Large-scale dosimetric assessment of Monte Carlo recalculated doses for lung robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy.大规模蒙特卡罗剂量重建用于肺机器人立体定向体部放射治疗的剂量学评估。
Phys Med. 2020 Aug;76:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.评估蒙特卡罗算法在接受立体定向体部放射治疗的周围型肺癌患者中符合 RTOG 0915 剂量学标准的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):277-293. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6077.
3
Dosimetric verification using monte carlo calculations for tissue heterogeneity-corrected conformal treatment plans following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.使用蒙特卡罗计算对肺癌立体定向体部放射治疗 RTOG 0813 剂量学标准下组织不均匀性校正的适形治疗计划进行剂量验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
4
Influence of CyberKnife Prescription Isodose Line on the Discrepancy of Dose Results Calculated by the Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Algorithms for Head and Lung Plans: A Phantom Study.射波刀计划等剂量线对头部和肺部计划射线追踪和蒙特卡罗算法计算剂量结果差异的影响:体模研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Apr;40(2):301-306. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2177-1. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
5
Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.对于肺部立体定向体部放射治疗,肿瘤位置和体积的不同会导致蒙特卡罗法和笔形束算法之间的剂量计算存在差异。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 4;14(2):4011. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4011.
6
Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.归一化处方等剂量线对肺部立体定向体部放射治疗中蒙特卡罗与笔形束靶区剂量差异大小的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 8;17(4):48-58. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.5965.
7
Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT.使用笔形束和蒙特卡罗方法计算的肺部立体定向体部放疗计划中的剂量差异。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Nov 8;16(6):91–99. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5514.
8
Evaluation of the influence of tumor location and size on the difference of dose calculation between Ray Tracing algorithm and Fast Monte Carlo algorithm in stereotactic body radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer using CyberKnife.评价使用 CyberKnife 立体定向体部放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌时,肿瘤位置和大小对射线追踪算法和快速蒙特卡罗算法剂量计算差异的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Sep 6;14(5):68-78. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4280.
9
On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.利用卷积叠加算法进行肺部立体定向体放射治疗计划检查。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):99-110. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6186.
10
Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Thoracic Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.基于射波刀的立体定向体部放射治疗中胸椎病变的射线追踪和蒙特卡罗计算算法比较
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Feb;15(1):196-202. doi: 10.1177/1533034614568026. Epub 2015 Jan 28.