Suppr超能文献

灭活和减毒流感疫苗针对同源和异源亚型攻击的免疫反应及保护效力

Immune Response and Protective Efficacy of Inactivated and Live Influenza Vaccines Against Homologous and Heterosubtypic Challenge.

作者信息

Boravleva E Y, Lunitsin A V, Kaplun A P, Bykova N V, Krasilnikov I V, Gambaryan A S

机构信息

Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune and Biological Products, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 108819, Russia.

FSBSI Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Volginsky, Vladimir Region, 601125, Russia.

出版信息

Biochemistry (Mosc). 2020 May;85(5):553-566. doi: 10.1134/S0006297920050041.

Abstract

Inactivated (whole-virion, split, subunit, and adjuvanted) vaccines and live attenuated vaccine were tested in parallel to compare their immunogenicity and protective efficacy. Homologous and heterosubtypic protection against the challenge with influenza H5N1 and H1N1 viruses in a mouse model were studied. Single immunization with live or inactivated whole-virion H5N1 vaccine elicited a high level of serum antibodies and provided complete protection against the challenge with the lethal A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05 (H5N1) virus, whereas application of a single dose of the split vaccine was much less effective. Adjuvants increased the antibody levels. Addition of the Iso-SANP adjuvant to the split vaccine led to a paradoxical outcome: it increased the antibody levels but reduced the protective effect of the vaccine. All tested adjuvants shifted the ratio between IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies. Immunization with any of the tested heterosubtypic live viruses provided partial protection against the H5N1 challenge and significantly reduced mouse mortality, while inactivated H1N1 vaccine offered no protection at all. More severe course of illness and earlier death were observed in mice after immunization with adjuvanted subunit vaccines followed by the challenge with the heterosubtypic virus compared to challenged unvaccinated animals.

摘要

对灭活疫苗(全病毒、裂解、亚单位和佐剂疫苗)和减毒活疫苗进行了平行测试,以比较它们的免疫原性和保护效力。研究了在小鼠模型中针对H5N1和H1N1流感病毒攻击的同源和异源亚型保护作用。用减毒活疫苗或灭活全病毒H5N1疫苗进行单次免疫可诱导高水平的血清抗体,并为抵抗致死性A/Chicken/Kurgan/3/05(H5N1)病毒的攻击提供完全保护,而单次接种裂解疫苗的效果则差得多。佐剂可提高抗体水平。向裂解疫苗中添加Iso-SANP佐剂产生了自相矛盾的结果:它提高了抗体水平,但降低了疫苗的保护效果。所有测试的佐剂均改变了IgG1和IgG2a抗体之间的比例。用任何一种测试的异源亚型活病毒进行免疫均可对H5N1攻击提供部分保护,并显著降低小鼠死亡率,而灭活H1N1疫苗则完全没有保护作用。与未接种疫苗而受到攻击的动物相比,用佐剂亚单位疫苗免疫后再用异源亚型病毒攻击的小鼠,观察到病情更严重且死亡更早。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验