Vieira Allan R, Peralta Antonio F, Toral Raul, Miguel Maxi San, Anteneodo Celia
Department of Physics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, 225, 22451-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Phys Rev E. 2020 May;101(5-1):052131. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.052131.
In the standard q-voter model, a given agent can change its opinion only if there is a full consensus of the opposite opinion within a group of influence of size q. A more realistic extension is the threshold q voter, where a minimal agreement (at least 0<q_{0}≤q opposite opinions) is sufficient to flip the central agent's opinion, including also the possibility of independent (nonconformist) choices. Variants of this model including nonconformist behavior have been previously studied in fully connected networks (mean-field limit). Here we investigate its dynamics in random networks. Particularly, while in the mean-field case it is irrelevant whether repetitions in the influence group are allowed, we show that this is not the case in networks, and we study the impact of both cases, with or without repetition. Furthermore, the results of computer simulations are compared with the predictions of the pair approximation derived for uncorrelated networks of arbitrary degree distributions.
在标准q-投票者模型中,给定的主体只有在大小为q的影响群体内存在完全相反意见的共识时,才能改变其意见。一个更现实的扩展是阈值q投票者模型,其中最小共识(至少0 < q₀≤q个相反意见)就足以改变中心主体的意见,还包括独立(不墨守成规)选择的可能性。此前已在全连接网络(平均场极限)中研究过包含不墨守成规行为的该模型变体。在此我们研究其在随机网络中的动态。特别地,虽然在平均场情形下影响群体中是否允许重复是无关紧要的,但我们表明在网络中并非如此,并且我们研究了这两种情况(有重复和无重复)的影响。此外,将计算机模拟结果与针对任意度分布的不相关网络推导的对近似预测进行了比较。