Phillips Victoria L, Roy Anil K, Ratcliff Jonathan, Pradilla Gustavo
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road NE, Building B, Suite 2200, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Stroke Res Treat. 2020 Jun 13;2020:6503038. doi: 10.1155/2020/6503038. eCollection 2020.
We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. . The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital.
The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using -tests, the Mann-Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not.
Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12-21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery.
These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation.
我们比较了微创束旁手术(MIPS)作为自发性幕上脑出血一线治疗方法与药物治疗的安全性和有效性。样本包括2014年1月至2016年12月接受MIPS治疗的17例患者,以及2012年6月至2013年12月接受药物治疗的23例患者作为对照组。所有患者的国际疾病分类(ICD)诊断均为431,且均在城市公共安全网医院格雷迪纪念医院接受治疗。
主要终点是住院死亡率。次要终点是住院感染率和良好出院状态,良好出院状态定义为出院回家或康复机构。分别使用t检验、曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验对连续、有序和分类指标的人口统计学数据以及临床前后结果进行比较。采用Cox比例风险模型估计住院死亡时间。使用逻辑回归分析确定治疗对次要结局的影响。我们还进行了探索性亚组分析,将MIPS与两个药物治疗亚组进行比较:住院期间接受手术的患者和未接受手术的患者。
MIPS组有2例患者(12%)死亡,药物治疗组有3例患者(12%)死亡。与药物治疗相比,MIPS并未增加住院死亡率。两组的住院感染率无显著差异;8例接受MIPS治疗的患者(47%)和13例接受药物治疗的患者(50%)发生感染。与药物治疗相比,MIPS显著提高了良好出院状态的可能性(优势比(OR)1.77;95%置信区间,1.12 - 21.9)。MIPS与未接受手术的药物治疗亚组之间的任何结局指标均无显著差异,而与接受手术的药物治疗组相比,接受MIPS治疗的患者良好出院率更高。
这些数据表明,MIPS作为自发性脑出血的一线治疗方法与自发性脑出血的药物治疗相比,值得进一步研究。