• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四前磨牙拔牙患者中主动和被动自锁托槽的转矩表达:一项回顾性研究。

Torque expression by active and passive self-ligating brackets in patients with four premolar extractions: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Nov;23(4):509-516. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12403. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12403
PMID:32583548
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque-control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

In this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi-square test.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the variation of U1-SN(°), U1-NA(°), L1-NB(°) and L1-FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.

CONCLUSIONS

With the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

适当的转矩表达有助于临床和美学上达到理想的治疗效果。主动自锁托槽(SLB)和被动自锁托槽在体内是否具有不同的转矩控制能力尚未见报道。本研究旨在探讨主动自锁托槽和被动自锁托槽在转矩表达上是否存在差异。

设置和样本人群

在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了 225 名接受四颗第一前磨牙拔牙的患者。每位患者在治疗前后均拍摄数字化侧位头颅侧位片。

材料和方法

研究包括两组:111 例患者接受被动自锁托槽(Damon Q,Ormco)治疗,114 例患者接受主动自锁托槽(Empower 2,美国 Orthodontics)治疗。使用 Dolphin 软件(美国版 11.8)从头颅侧位片上的头影测量获得确定骨骼变化和切牙倾斜度的测量值。使用 t 检验和卡方检验对两组之间和组间进行比较。

结果

两组之间 U1-SN(°)、U1-NA(°)、L1-NB(°)和 L1-FH(°)的变化存在显著差异。主动自锁托槽组的上颌切牙更向唇侧倾斜,而被动自锁托槽组的下颌切牙更向唇侧倾斜。

结论

在两种托槽的现有处方设置下,主动自锁托槽使上颌切牙更前倾,下颌切牙更后倾。临床医生在正畸治疗中应考虑托槽的转矩表达。

相似文献

1
Torque expression by active and passive self-ligating brackets in patients with four premolar extractions: A retrospective study.四前磨牙拔牙患者中主动和被动自锁托槽的转矩表达:一项回顾性研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Nov;23(4):509-516. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12403. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.自锁托槽的扭矩表达
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 May;133(5):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051.
3
Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.需要拔除前磨牙的患者使用自锁托槽和传统托槽时上颌牙弓宽度变化的比较——一项随机临床试验。
Int Orthod. 2019 Dec;17(4):687-692. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Comparative analysis of passive play and torque expression in self-ligating and traditional lingual brackets.自锁托槽和传统舌侧托槽的被动 PLAY 与转矩表达的对比分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan;83(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00314-1. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.青少年主动自锁式与被动自锁式矫治器和传统矫治器的排齐效率和间隙关闭比较:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024.
6
A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.使用反Spee曲线镍钛弓丝对传统托槽和自锁托槽在上颌切牙处产生的力和力矩进行比较评估。
Aust Orthod J. 2010 Nov;26(2):127-33.
7
Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.使用宽弓丝评估自锁托槽和传统托槽对上颌牙弓尺寸和倾斜度变化的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):830-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.024.
8
Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.自锁托槽和传统托槽扭矩能力的数值模拟
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.018.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.舌侧托槽与唇侧托槽牙齿排齐效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005.
10
Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.自锁托槽和传统托槽的治疗时间、疗效和支抗丢失比较。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):280-5. doi: 10.2319/041912-326.1. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Torque moments and stress analysis in two passive self-ligating brackets across different incisor inclinations: A 3-dimensional finite element study.两种被动自锁托槽在不同切牙倾斜度下的扭矩力矩和应力分析:一项三维有限元研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Sep-Oct;14(5):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Clinical effects of different prescriptions on the inclination of maxillary and mandibular incisors by using passive self-ligating brackets.使用被动自锁托槽时不同矫治方案对上颌及下颌切牙倾斜度的临床效果
Korean J Orthod. 2022 Nov 25;52(6):387-398. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.009. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Difference in the alveolar bone remodeling between the adolescents and adults during upper incisor retraction: a retrospective study.
青少年与成年人在上颌前牙内收过程中牙槽骨重塑的差异:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 1;12(1):9161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12967-y.