Sarıkaya Baran, Bozkurt Celal, Gül Orkun, Bekin Sarıkaya Pelin Zeynep, Sipahioğlu Serkan, Altay Mehmet Akif
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 63300 Şanlıurfa, Türkiye.
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):223-229. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74750. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
This study aims to compare the clinical results of patients with traumatic isolated Bankart lesions and type V superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions after arthroscopic repair.
Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability were evaluated retrospectively between December 2014 and January 2019. Fifty-one patients (49 males, 2 females; mean age 25 years; range, 18 to 36 years) without bone defects affecting >20% of the glenoid fossa, off-track engaging Hills-Sachs lesions, multidirectional instability, or ligamentous laxity were included in the study. Group 1 had 31 patients with isolated Bankart lesions and group 2 had 20 patients with type V SLAP lesions. There were only two female patients in group 1 and all patients were male in group 2. The mean age was 25 years (range, 18 to 36 years) in group 1 and 25 years (range, 19 to 35 years) in group 2. Rowe, Constant, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) scoring systems were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients preoperatively and at the last follow-up.
The mean follow-up time was 32 months (range, 12 to 48 months) in group 1 and 28.5 months (range, 12 to 42 months) in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the number of shoulder dislocations before the surgery, mean age at the time of surgery, and the mean time from the first dislocation to surgical treatment. When the Rowe, Constant, and WOSI scores were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up, there were statistically significant changes within, but not between, the two groups.
In type V SLAP lesions, the affected and repaired labrum surface area is larger than isolated Bankart lesions. However, as a result of appropriate surgical treatment, the affected surface area does not have a negative effect on clinical outcomes, and similar clinical results can be obtained in patients with type V SLAP lesions compared to patients with isolated Bankart lesions.
本研究旨在比较创伤性单纯Bankart损伤患者与关节镜修复术后V型上盂唇前后向(SLAP)损伤患者的临床结果。
回顾性评估2014年12月至2019年1月间接受关节镜修复治疗创伤性前盂肱关节不稳的患者。纳入51例患者(49例男性,2例女性;平均年龄25岁;范围18至36岁),这些患者不存在影响肩胛盂窝超过20%的骨缺损、脱轨嵌合的Hill-Sachs损伤、多向不稳或韧带松弛。第1组有31例单纯Bankart损伤患者,第2组有20例V型SLAP损伤患者。第1组仅有2例女性患者,第2组所有患者均为男性。第1组平均年龄为25岁(范围18至36岁),第2组平均年龄为25岁(范围19至35岁)。采用Rowe、Constant和西安大略肩不稳(WOSI)评分系统在术前及末次随访时评估患者的临床结局。
第1组平均随访时间为32个月(范围12至48个月),第2组为28.5个月(范围12至42个月)。两组在手术前肩关节脱位次数、手术时平均年龄以及首次脱位至手术治疗的平均时间方面无统计学显著差异。当在术前及末次随访时评估Rowe、Constant和WOSI评分时,两组内有统计学显著变化,但两组间无显著变化。
在V型SLAP损伤中,受影响并修复的盂唇表面积大于单纯Bankart损伤。然而,由于适当的手术治疗,受影响的表面积对临床结局没有负面影响,与单纯Bankart损伤患者相比,V型SLAP损伤患者可获得相似的临床结果。