Suppr超能文献

色谱法、化学计量学及抗氧化性评估:板蓝根颗粒与药材的等效性

Chromatographic, Chemometric and Antioxidant Assessment of the Equivalence of Granules and Herbal Materials of Radix.

作者信息

Razmovski-Naumovski Valentina, Zhou Xian, Wong Ho Yee, Kam Antony, Pearson Jarryd, Chan Kelvin

机构信息

South Western Sydney Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Medicines (Basel). 2020 Jun 23;7(6):35. doi: 10.3390/medicines7060035.

Abstract

Granules are a popular way of administrating herbal decoctions. However, there are no standardised quality control methods for granules, with few studies comparing the granules to traditional herbal decoctions. This study developed a multi-analytical platform to compare the quality of granule products to herb/decoction pieces of Angelicae Sinensis Radix (Danggui). A validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detector (UPLC-PDA) method quantitatively compared the aqueous extracts. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) clustered the samples according to three chemical compounds: ferulic acid, caffeic acid and Z-ligustilide. Ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) assessed the antioxidant activity of the samples. HCA and PCA allocated the samples into two main groups: granule products and herb/decoction pieces. Greater differentiation between the samples was obtained with three chemical markers compared to using one marker. The herb/decoction pieces group showed comparatively higher extraction yields and significantly higher DPPH and FRAP ( < 0.05), which was positively correlated to caffeic acid and ferulic acid, respectively. The results confirm the need for the quality assessment of granule products using more than one chemical marker for widespread practitioner and consumer use.

摘要

颗粒剂是一种常用的中药汤剂给药方式。然而,颗粒剂尚无标准化的质量控制方法,很少有研究将颗粒剂与传统中药汤剂进行比较。本研究开发了一个多分析平台,以比较当归颗粒产品与当归药材/饮片的质量。一种经过验证的超高效液相色谱-光电二极管阵列检测器联用(UPLC-PDA)方法对水提取物进行了定量比较。层次聚类分析(HCA)和主成分分析(PCA)根据阿魏酸、咖啡酸和Z-藁本内酯三种化合物对样品进行聚类。铁离子还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)和2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼自由基清除能力(DPPH)评估了样品的抗氧化活性。HCA和PCA将样品分为两个主要组:颗粒产品组和药材/饮片组。与使用一种化学标志物相比,使用三种化学标志物能使样品之间的差异更大。药材/饮片组的提取率相对较高,DPPH和FRAP也显著更高(P<0.05),分别与咖啡酸和阿魏酸呈正相关。结果证实,对于广泛应用的从业者和消费者而言,需要使用多种化学标志物对颗粒产品进行质量评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a7/7345935/1835e12b456f/medicines-07-00035-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验