• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过消费者驱动的过程设计并在基于现场的随机对照试验中进行评估的儿童汽车座椅正确使用说明的影响的过程评估方案。

A Process Evaluation Protocol for Examining the Impact of Instructions for Correct Use of Child Car Seats Designed through a Consumer-Driven Process and Evaluated in a Field-Based Randomised Controlled Trial.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2042, Australia.

Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124508.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17124508
PMID:32585923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7345236/
Abstract

The incorrect use of child car seats is common, with significant negative effects on crash protection for child passengers. There is currently little evidence for effective, practical countermeasures for incorrect use. The provision of clear and comprehensible materials on correct use supplied with restraints at the point of sale could be highly cost-effective and achieve similar benefits to restraint-fitting services or hands-on training; however, routinely supplied instructions in their current form are frequently difficult to understand. We are conducting a randomised controlled trial of the consumer-driven redesign of instructional materials, consisting of an instruction sheet, swing tags and online training videos. This paper presents the protocol that will be used in an innovate process evaluation that will use the primary outcome of overall serious misuse assessed at six months, together with a survey and semi-structured interviews to determine fidelity, dose and outcomes for all intervention participants. The study will assess intervention delivery and external factors that may impact the effectiveness of the intervention, including experience, health literacy, confidence and attitudes. When it has been conducted, this process evaluation will provide enhanced understanding of the mechanisms through which the intervention works or not, aspects of the implementation process key to success of the intervention and insight into how external factors influence the success of the intervention.

摘要

儿童汽车安全座椅的使用不当较为常见,这对乘车儿童的碰撞保护会产生严重的负面影响。目前,针对不当使用,几乎没有有效的、实用的对策。在销售点为约束装置提供关于正确使用的清晰易懂的材料可能具有很高的成本效益,并能实现与约束装置适配服务或实践培训类似的效益;然而,目前以这种形式提供的常规说明通常难以理解。我们正在进行一项消费者驱动的指导材料重新设计的随机对照试验,包括使用说明、吊牌和在线培训视频。本文介绍了将在创新的过程评估中使用的方案,该评估将使用六个月时总体严重误用的主要结果,以及调查和半结构化访谈,以确定所有干预参与者的保真度、剂量和结果。该研究将评估干预措施的提供情况和可能影响干预效果的外部因素,包括经验、健康素养、信心和态度。完成后,该过程评估将更深入地了解干预措施的作用机制或失效原因、对干预措施成功至关重要的实施过程方面,以及外部因素如何影响干预措施的成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd6a/7345236/c54bb08f45d6/ijerph-17-04508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd6a/7345236/c54bb08f45d6/ijerph-17-04508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd6a/7345236/c54bb08f45d6/ijerph-17-04508-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Process Evaluation Protocol for Examining the Impact of Instructions for Correct Use of Child Car Seats Designed through a Consumer-Driven Process and Evaluated in a Field-Based Randomised Controlled Trial.一种通过消费者驱动的过程设计并在基于现场的随机对照试验中进行评估的儿童汽车座椅正确使用说明的影响的过程评估方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124508.
2
Can child restraint product information developed using consumer testing sustain correct use 6 months after child restraint purchase? Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.利用消费者测试开发的儿童约束产品信息在儿童约束购买后 6 个月内是否能维持正确使用?一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Inj Prev. 2019 Jun;25(3):175-179. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042571. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
3
4
User-driven instructions reduce errors in child restraint use: a randomised controlled trial in Sydney, Australia.用户驱动的指导可减少儿童安全座椅使用中的错误:澳大利亚悉尼的一项随机对照试验。
Inj Prev. 2025 May 20;31(3):217-222. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045213.
5
Buckle up safely: a cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-school based program to increase appropriate use of child restraints.安全扣紧安全带:一项基于幼儿园的群组随机对照试验,旨在评估增加儿童约束装置正确使用的方案的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 6;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-16.
6
High levels of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife--an important and under-recognised road safety issue.法夫郡汽车安全带和儿童安全座椅的不当使用率很高——一个重要但未得到充分认识的道路安全问题。
Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):17-22. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.17.
7
User-driven design of child restraint information to reduce errors in use: a pilot randomised controlled trial.用户驱动的儿童约束系统信息设计,以减少使用错误:一项试点随机对照试验。
Inj Prev. 2020 Oct;26(5):432-438. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043380. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety.挪威高速道路儿童约束实践观察研究:约束误用对儿童乘客安全构成重大威胁。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:479-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
9
A maternity hospital-based infant car-restraint loan scheme: public health and economic evaluation of an intervention for the reduction of road traffic injuries.一项基于妇产医院的婴儿汽车安全座椅租赁计划:减少道路交通伤害干预措施的公共卫生与经济评估
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(1):42-9. doi: 10.1080/14034940410028334.
10
The impact of new legislation on child restraint system (CRS) misuse and inappropriate use in Australia.新立法对澳大利亚儿童约束系统(CRS)误用和不当使用的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(4):387-96. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.700746.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potential of a Behavior Theory-Informed Digital Intervention for Infant Fall Prevention: Mixed Methods Longitudinal Study.探索基于行为理论的数字干预在预防婴儿跌倒方面的潜力:混合方法纵向研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Jan 3;7:e47361. doi: 10.2196/47361.

本文引用的文献

1
User-driven design of child restraint information to reduce errors in use: a pilot randomised controlled trial.用户驱动的儿童约束系统信息设计,以减少使用错误:一项试点随机对照试验。
Inj Prev. 2020 Oct;26(5):432-438. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043380. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
2
Teaching installation and use of child passenger safety restraints.教授儿童乘客安全约束装置的安装和使用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Oct;51(4):915-923. doi: 10.1002/jaba.493. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Using interactive virtual presence to support accurate installation of child restraints: Efficacy and parental perceptions.
使用交互式虚拟技术支持儿童安全座椅的正确安装:效果及家长认知
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
User testing as a method for identifying how consumers say they would act on information related to over-the-counter medicines.用户测试作为一种方法,用于确定消费者如何表达他们对非处方药相关信息的行为意向。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 May-Jun;13(3):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Child restraint use and parental perceptions of comfort.儿童安全座椅的使用及家长对舒适度的看法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):758-62. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1142078. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Observed child restraint misuse in a large, urban community: Results from three years of inspection events.在一个大型城市社区观察到的儿童安全座椅使用不当情况:三年检查活动的结果。
J Safety Res. 2016 Feb;56:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
7
Unsafe from the Start: Serious Misuse of Car Safety Seats at Newborn Discharge.从一开始就不安全:新生儿出院时严重滥用汽车安全座椅。
J Pediatr. 2016 Apr;171:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.047. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
8
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
9
Behavioral skills training to improve installation and use of child passenger safety restraints.行为技能培训以改善儿童乘客安全约束装置的安装和使用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):549-59. doi: 10.1002/jaba.143. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
10
Disparities in age-appropriate child passenger restraint use among children aged 1 to 12 years.1 至 12 岁儿童使用符合年龄的儿童乘客约束装置的差异。
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):262-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1908. Epub 2014 Jan 13.