Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 E. Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA
Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 E. Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2020 Aug 13;223(Pt 15):jeb228544. doi: 10.1242/jeb.228544.
Sea urchins native to the nearshore open coast experience periods of high, repeated wave forces that can result in dislodgement. To remain attached while clinging and locomoting across rocky substrates, sea urchins use adhesive tube feet. Purple sea urchins () adhere to a variety of rock substrates (e.g. sandstone, mudstone, granite), and display morphological plasticity (skeletal morphology) to native substrate. We tested the hypothesis that their adhesive system is also plastic and varies as a function of native population and substrate. The results of our study support our hypothesis. Sea urchins from sandstone adhere less strongly to most substrates than those native to mudstone and granite rock. Sandstone produced the lowest whole animal adhesive force values across all populations, suggesting that this rock type is particularly challenging for sea urchins to adhere to. The number of adhesive tube feet that failed during experimental trials and the area used by sea urchins to attach, matches closely with whole animal adhesive force values: higher forces resulted in more tube foot failure and larger attachment area. On artificial substrates (glass and Plexiglass), differences in adhesion among populations was consistent with differences in adhesion on rock substrates except on glass, where sea urchins native to sandstone adhered more strongly to glass than any other substrate tested. To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe population-level plasticity in a biological adhesive system related to native substrate, and has significant implications for sea urchin ecology, behavior and functional morphology.
原产于近岸开阔海域的海胆会经历高强度、反复的波浪力,这可能导致其脱落。为了在附着和在岩石基质上移动时保持附着,海胆使用粘性管足。紫海胆()附着在各种岩石基质上(例如砂岩、泥岩、花岗岩),并显示出对本地基质的形态可塑性(骨骼形态)。我们测试了以下假设:它们的粘附系统也是可塑的,并随本地种群和基质的变化而变化。我们的研究结果支持我们的假设。与原产于泥岩和花岗岩的海胆相比,来自砂岩的海胆对大多数基质的粘附力较弱。砂岩在所有种群中产生的整体动物粘附力值最低,这表明这种岩石类型对海胆来说特别难以附着。在实验试验中失败的粘性管足数量和海胆用于附着的区域与整体动物粘附力值密切匹配:较高的力导致更多的管足失败和更大的附着区域。在人造基质(玻璃和有机玻璃)上,种群间粘附力的差异与在岩石基质上的粘附力差异一致,但在玻璃上,来自砂岩的海胆对玻璃的粘附力强于任何其他测试的基质。据我们所知,这项研究首次描述了与本地基质相关的生物粘附系统中的种群水平可塑性,这对海胆生态学、行为和功能形态学具有重要意义。