Tibial tubercle transfer leads to clinically relevant improvement in patients with patellar maltracking without instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

To assess the different surgical techniques and their outcomes following tibial tubercle transfer (TTT) in patients with patellar maltracking.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or clinical outcome following: TTT in patients with patellar maltracking were included. Collected PROMs were Lysholm, Kujala, IKDC score, and VAS pain. Clinical outcome included reported clinical success, patient satisfaction, complications and removal of hardware (ROH). Overall pre-, post-operative and change scores were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Results were reported as overall mean and per transfer direction.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies and 761 patients (818 knees, mean age 35 years, mean follow-up 5.0 years) were included. In 73% of the studies, surgery was performed after failed conservative treatment. Transfer direction was anteromedial in 76% of all procedures. Overall Lysholm score improved from 61 to 91, Kujala from 52 to 85, IKDC from 53 to 81, and VAS from 6.2 to 2.5, respectively. Clinical success was reported in 79% of patients, and 80% of patients reported to have satisfactory results. Rates of complications and ROH were 13% and 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TTT for management of patellar maltracking can lead to good results with clinically meaningful improvement, an overall clinical success of 79% and overall patient satisfaction of 80% when appreciating the underlying anatomic condition and using appropriate technique. The level of evidence was low, and large-scale prospective, comparative cohort studies with uniform outcome scales are needed to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.