Suppr超能文献

乐伐替尼治疗伴有门静脉主干侵犯的大肝细胞癌:两例报告

Lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinomas with portal trunk invasion: Two case reports.

作者信息

Komiyama Satoshi, Numata Kazushi, Moriya Satoshi, Fukuda Hiroyuki, Chuma Makoto, Maeda Shin

机构信息

Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2320024, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360004, Japan.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jun 26;8(12):2574-2584. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2574.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a phase III trial of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), the drug proved non-inferior to sorafenib in terms of the overall survival, but offered better progression-free survival. However, the effects of lenvatinib in uHCC patients with a tumor thrombus in the main portal vein and/or a high tumor burden (tumor occupancy more than 50% of the total liver volume), remain unclear, because these were set as exclusion criteria in the aforementioned trial.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old man (case 1) and 66-year-old woman (case 2) with uHCC presented to us with a tumor thrombus in both the main portal vein and inferior vena cava, a high tumor burden accompanied by a tumor diameter greater than > 100 mm, and distant metastasis, with the residual liver function classified as grade 2A according to the modified Albumin-Bilirubin grading. We started both patients on lenvatinib. The therapeutic effect, as evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, was rated as partial response in both case 1 and case 2 (at 8 wk and 4 wk after the start of lenvatinib administration, respectively). The therapeutic effect was sustained for 6 mo in case 1 and 20 mo in case 2. Fever occurred as an adverse event in both case 1 and 2, and hyperthyroidism and thrombocytopenia in only case 2, neither of which, however, necessitated treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Even in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with poor prognostic factors, if the liver function is well-preserved, lenvatinib is effective and safe.

摘要

背景

在一项关于乐伐替尼作为晚期不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)一线治疗的III期试验中,该药物在总生存期方面被证明不劣于索拉非尼,但无进展生存期更佳。然而,乐伐替尼在伴有门静脉主干肿瘤血栓和/或肿瘤负荷高(肿瘤占据肝脏总体积超过50%)的uHCC患者中的疗效仍不明确,因为在上述试验中将这些情况设定为排除标准。

病例摘要

一名53岁男性(病例1)和一名66岁女性(病例2)患有uHCC,就诊时门静脉主干和下腔静脉均有肿瘤血栓,肿瘤负荷高,肿瘤直径大于100 mm,伴有远处转移,根据改良的白蛋白-胆红素分级,残余肝功能为2A级。我们让两名患者均开始使用乐伐替尼治疗。根据改良的实体瘤疗效评价标准评估,两名患者的治疗效果均评定为部分缓解(病例1和病例2分别在乐伐替尼给药开始后8周和4周时)。病例1的治疗效果持续了6个月,病例2持续了20个月。发热在病例1和病例2中均作为不良事件出现,甲状腺功能亢进和血小板减少仅在病例2中出现,但均未导致治疗中断。

结论

即使在具有不良预后因素的肝细胞癌患者中,如果肝功能保存良好,乐伐替尼也是有效且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97ae/7322437/11b35e754b5d/WJCC-8-2574-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验