Leclercq J F, Chouty F, Cauchemez B, Leenhardt A, Coumel P, Slama R
Department of Cardiology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Aug 1;62(4):220-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90215-9.
Eleven patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs due to right ventricular disease shown by angiography underwent fulguration. Seven patients always had VT with the same morphology, and 4 had clinical VT with 2 or 3 different QRS waveforms. Five patients underwent a single fulguration and the other 6 underwent from 2 to 5 procedures; 2 to 14 shocks (mean 6) of 150 to 250 J were used. No serious complications occurred. At 31.5 +/- 9 months of follow-up, the arrhythmia was controlled in 8 patients, with continuation of previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 6 of 8. The number of VT episodes the year before and after fulguration was 0.5 +/- 0.7 vs 3.5 +/- 1.7 (p less than 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the success rate and the degree of prematurity of the onset of the local electrogram during VT: -36 +/- 31 ms for successes and -38 +/- 13 ms for failures. In 7 patients with monomorphic VT, there were 6 successes and 1 failure, and in 4 patients with several morphologies of VT, there were 2 successes and 2 failures (1 due to the appearance of a "new" VT). Thus, electrical fulguration of VT in patients with right ventricular disease is safe and most often effective, particularly in patients with monomorphic VT, when combined with antiarrhythmic drugs. In these patients, the usually recommended endocardial mapping criteria for the determination of the optimal fulguration site were not predictive of outcome. Further studies are necessary to better define the optimal site for fulguration.
11例因右心室疾病导致抗心律失常药物治疗无效的持续性室性心动过速(VT)患者接受了电灼治疗,血管造影显示存在右心室疾病。7例患者的室性心动过速形态始终相同,4例患者的临床室性心动过速有2或3种不同的QRS波形。5例患者接受了单次电灼治疗,另外6例患者接受了2至5次治疗;使用了150至250焦耳的2至14次电击(平均6次)。未发生严重并发症。在31.5±9个月的随访中,8例患者的心律失常得到控制,其中6例在8例中继续使用先前无效的抗心律失常药物治疗。电灼治疗前后每年的室性心动过速发作次数分别为0.5±0.7次和3.5±1.7次(p<0.001)。室性心动过速期间局部心电图发作的成功率和提前程度之间无统计学显著差异:成功组为-36±31毫秒,失败组为-38±13毫秒。在7例单形性室性心动过速患者中,6例成功,1例失败;在4例有几种室性心动过速形态的患者中,2例成功,2例失败(1例因出现“新的”室性心动过速)。因此,对于右心室疾病患者,室性心动过速的电灼治疗是安全的,而且大多数情况下是有效的,特别是对于单形性室性心动过速患者,与抗心律失常药物联合使用时。在这些患者中,通常推荐的用于确定最佳电灼部位的心内膜标测标准并不能预测治疗结果。需要进一步研究以更好地确定最佳电灼部位。