Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):50-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30537-7.
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard operation for benign prostatic obstruction. Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) is a technique with suggested advantages over TURP, including reduced complications and hospital stay. We aimed to investigate TURP versus ThuVARP in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.
In this randomised, blinded, parallel-group, pragmatic equivalence trial, men in seven UK hospitals with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction were randomly assigned (1:1) at the point of surgery to receive ThuVARP or TURP. Patients were masked until follow-up completion. Centres used their usual TURP procedure (monopolar or bipolar). All trial surgeons underwent training on the ThuVARP technique. Co-primary outcomes were maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12-months post-surgery. Equivalence was defined as a difference of 2·5 points or less for IPSS and 4 mL per s or less for Qmax. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN00788389.
Between July 23, 2014, and Dec 30, 2016, 410 men were randomly assigned to ThuVARP or TURP, 205 per study group. TURP was superior for Qmax (mean 23·2 mL per s for TURP and 20·2 mL per s for ThuVARP; adjusted difference in means -3·12, 95% CI -5·79 to -0·45). Equivalence was shown for IPSS (mean 6·3 for TURP and 6·4 for ThuVARP; adjusted difference in means 0·28, -0·92 to 1·49). Mean hospital stay was 48 h in both study groups. 91 (45%) of 204 patients in the TURP group and 96 (47%) of 203 patients in the ThuVARP group had at least one complication.
TURP and ThuVARP were equivalent for urinary symptom improvement (IPSS) 12-months post-surgery, and TURP was superior for Qmax. Anticipated laser benefits for ThuVARP of reduced hospital stay and complications were not observed.
UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)是治疗良性前列腺梗阻的标准手术。钬激光经尿道前列腺汽化切除术(ThuVARP)是一种技术,与 TURP 相比具有减少并发症和住院时间的优势。我们旨在研究 TURP 与 ThuVARP 在因良性前列腺梗阻而出现下尿路症状或尿潴留的男性中的应用。
在这项随机、盲法、平行组、实用等效性试验中,在英国七家医院接受手术的因良性前列腺梗阻而出现烦人的下尿路症状或尿潴留的男性,按照 1:1 的比例在手术点被随机分配接受 ThuVARP 或 TURP 治疗。患者在随访完成前保持蒙眼状态。各中心使用其常规 TURP 程序(单极或双极)。所有试验外科医生都接受了 ThuVARP 技术的培训。主要结局是术后 12 个月时最大尿流率(Qmax)和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。等效性定义为 IPSS 相差 2.5 分或以下,Qmax 相差 4 mL/s 或以下。分析按照意向治疗原则进行。该试验在 ISRCTN 注册中心进行了注册,注册号为 ISRCTN00788389。
2014 年 7 月 23 日至 2016 年 12 月 30 日,410 名男性被随机分配至 ThuVARP 或 TURP 组,每组 205 名。TURP 组的 Qmax 更高(TURP 组为 23.2 mL/s,ThuVARP 组为 20.2 mL/s;调整后的平均差值为-3.12,95%CI-5.79 至-0.45)。两组之间 IPSS 等效(TURP 组平均为 6.3,ThuVARP 组为 6.4;调整后的平均差值为 0.28,-0.92 至 1.49)。两组患者的平均住院时间均为 48 小时。TURP 组 204 名患者中有 91 名(45%)和 ThuVARP 组 203 名患者中有 96 名(47%)至少发生了一种并发症。
TURP 和 ThuVARP 在术后 12 个月时对改善(IPSS)的疗效相当,而 TURP 在 Qmax 方面更优。并未观察到 ThuVARP 预期的减少激光住院时间和并发症的优势。
英国国家卫生研究院健康技术评估计划。