Suppr超能文献

鉴定和验证上皮性卵巢癌中差异的血浆蛋白质水平。

Identification and validation of differential plasma proteins levels in epithelial ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.

Department of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.

出版信息

J Proteomics. 2020 Aug 30;226:103893. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103893. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

Abstract

Diagnosis of Ovarian cancer (OC) has been a challenge, the purpose, therefore is to identify plasma proteins differentially expressed in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Human plasma samples from patients with OC (n = 138), benign tumors (n = 20) and controls (n = 238) were used. Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) based quantitative analysis by high resolution mass spectrometry, was followed by validation using Quantibody array and ELISA techniques. 507 plasma proteins showed differential protein levels in OC plasma samples. 21 proteins were validated using Quantibody array. Further, nine proteins (CA125, CFD, CST3, ICAM1, IGFBP2, IGFBP3, SPP1, TSP1 and VEGFA) which showed significant differences in protein levels in Quantibody array analysis were validated using ELISA. In ELISA, the levels of CA125, IGFBP2, ICAM1 and SPP1 were significantly increased and levels of Adipsin and TSP1 were decreased in tumors compared to controls and benign group. Epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis model combining five markers (CA125, IGFBP2, SPP1, TSP1 and ADI) showed 90.24% sensitivity and 94.87% specificity. In conclusion a panel of 5 plasma proteins has been found to be useful in distinguishing plasma samples from epithelial ovarian cancers from patients with benign tumors and healthy normal subjects. This has the potential as a diagnostic assay for epithelial ovarian cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: The significance of this case-control study is based on the large and well defined ovarian cancer patient population (epithelial ovarian cancers including serous and mucinous subtypes), age matched controls and benign ovarian tumors. This study incorporates a discovery phase involving quantitative proteomic analysis of immune-depleted plasma followed by two levels of validation studies involving a selected list of proteins using antibody arrays and ELISA. The validations were performed on an independent set of samples comprising of epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes, controls and benign tumors. The multiple marker combination comprising of Adipsin, CA125, IGFBP2, SPP1 and TSP1 identified in the study by ELISA could enable rapid translation to a larger screening study.

摘要

卵巢癌(OC)的诊断一直是一个挑战,因此本研究旨在鉴定上皮性卵巢癌患者血浆中差异表达的蛋白质。使用了来自上皮性卵巢癌患者(n=138)、良性肿瘤患者(n=20)和对照组(n=238)的人血浆样本。采用高分辨率质谱的串联质量标签(TMT)定量分析,随后使用 Quantibody 阵列和 ELISA 技术进行验证。OC 血浆样本中 507 种血浆蛋白显示出差异蛋白水平。使用 Quantibody 阵列验证了 21 种蛋白质。此外,在 Quantibody 阵列分析中显示蛋白水平显著差异的 9 种蛋白(CA125、CFD、CST3、ICAM1、IGFBP2、IGFBP3、SPP1、TSP1 和 VEGFA)使用 ELISA 进行了验证。在 ELISA 中,与对照组和良性组相比,肿瘤中 CA125、IGFBP2、ICAM1 和 SPP1 的水平显著升高,而 Adipsin 和 TSP1 的水平降低。结合 5 种标志物(CA125、IGFBP2、SPP1、TSP1 和 ADI)的上皮性卵巢癌诊断模型显示出 90.24%的敏感性和 94.87%的特异性。总之,已经发现一组 5 种血浆蛋白可用于区分上皮性卵巢癌患者的血浆样本与良性肿瘤和健康正常个体的血浆样本。这有可能成为上皮性卵巢癌的诊断检测方法。本病例对照研究的意义基于大型和明确的卵巢癌患者人群(包括浆液性和黏液性亚型的上皮性卵巢癌)、年龄匹配的对照组和良性卵巢肿瘤。本研究包含一个发现阶段,涉及免疫耗尽血浆的定量蛋白质组分析,随后进行了两个验证阶段,使用抗体阵列和 ELISA 研究了一组选定的蛋白质。验证是在上皮性卵巢癌亚型、对照组和良性肿瘤的独立样本集上进行的。ELISA 鉴定的 Adipsin、CA125、IGFBP2、SPP1 和 TSP1 的多标志物组合可实现快速转化为更大的筛选研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验