Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):201-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.084.
Clinicians often encounter discrepant measurements of the ascending aorta that impede, complicate, and impair appropriate clinical assessment-including key issues of presence or absence of aortic growth, rate of growth, and need for surgical intervention. These discrepancies may arise within a single modality (computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or echocardiography) or between modalities. The authors explore the origins and significance of these discrepancies, revealing that some "truth" usually underlies all the discrepant measurements, which individually look at the ascending aorta with different perspectives and dimensional definitions. The authors conclude with a practical "question and answer" section that addresses common specific issues in interpretation and management of patients in the real-world setting.
临床医生经常会遇到升主动脉测量值的差异,这些差异会阻碍、复杂化并影响到适当的临床评估,包括主动脉生长的有无、生长速度以及是否需要手术干预等关键问题。这些差异可能出现在单一模态(计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像或超声心动图)内,也可能出现在不同模态之间。作者探讨了这些差异的起源和意义,揭示了一些“真相”,通常所有的差异测量都基于不同的视角和维度定义来观察升主动脉。作者在文末以实用的“问答”部分,针对在实际情况下解释和管理患者时常见的具体问题进行了讨论。