National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05776-2. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on improving the prognosis of patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: TNBC patients diagnosed in the SEER 18 database from 2010 to 2015 were included. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to compare the differences in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between subgroups of variables. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the prognostic factors affecting BCSS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 9256 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 380 died from breast cancer, and 703 died from all causes. Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly better BCSS and OS than those who did not receive chemotherapy for stage T1cN0M0 (BCSS, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.90; OS, HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.67) and stage IB (BCSS, HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.95; OS, HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.87) disease. Patients who received chemotherapy did not have significantly better BCSS or OS than those who did not receive chemotherapy for stage T1aN0M0 or T1bN0M0 disease. The patients who received chemotherapy in the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated groups had better BCSS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88) and OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.66) than the patients who did not receive chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to current clinical guidelines, patients with stage T1bN0M0 TNBC are probably overtreated. The prognosis of these patients with stage T1aN0M0 or T1bN0M0 disease is good enough that adjuvant chemotherapy cannot improve it further.
目的:评估辅助化疗改善 I 期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者预后的效果。
方法:纳入 2010 年至 2015 年 SEER 18 数据库中诊断为 TNBC 的患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 图和对数秩检验比较不同变量亚组间乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总生存(OS)的差异。采用 Cox 比例风险模型确定影响 BCSS 和 OS 的预后因素。
结果:共纳入 9256 例患者。其中 380 例死于乳腺癌,703 例死于其他原因。与未接受化疗的 T1cN0M0 期(BCSS:风险比[HR] = 0.68,95%置信区间[CI] 0.51-0.90;OS:HR = 0.54,95%CI 0.44-0.67)和 IB 期(BCSS:HR = 0.39,95%CI 0.16-0.95;OS:HR = 0.41,95%CI 0.19-0.87)患者相比,接受化疗的患者具有更好的 BCSS 和 OS。与未接受化疗的 T1aN0M0 或 T1bN0M0 期患者相比,接受化疗的患者在低分化和未分化组中具有更好的 BCSS(HR = 0.68,95%CI 0.52-0.88)和 OS(HR = 0.54,95%CI 0.44-0.66)。
结论:根据当前临床指南,T1bN0M0 期 TNBC 患者可能接受了过度治疗。这些 T1aN0M0 或 T1bN0M0 期患者的预后已经足够好,辅助化疗无法进一步改善。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020-11-2
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-1
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018-10-19
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024-4-4
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-1