Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Dec;20(6):e749-e756. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 May 5.
Wire-guided localization (WGL) of early breast cancer can be facilitated using multiple wires, which is called bracketing wire-guided localization (BWL). The primary aim of this study is to compare BWL and conventional WGL regarding minimization of resection volumes without compromising margin status. Secondly, BWL is evaluated as an alternative method for intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance in poorly definable breast tumors on US.
In this retrospective cohort study, patients with preoperatively diagnosed breast cancer undergoing wide local excision between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed. Patients with multifocal disease or neoadjuvant treatment were excluded from this study. Optimal resection with minimal healthy breast tissue removal was assessed using the calculated resection ratio (CRR).
BWL was performed in 17 (9%) patients, WGL in 44 (22%), and US in 139 (70%). The rate of negative margins was comparable in all 3 groups. The CRR was significantly smaller for BWL (0.6) than WGL (1.3) in tumors larger than 1.5 cm. Additionally, BWL (0.8) led to smaller CRRs than US (1.7). This could be explained by the high number of small tumors (≤ 1.5 cm) in the US group for which greater CRRs are obtained than for large tumors (> 1.5 cm) (1.9 vs. 1.4; P = .005).
For breast tumors larger than 1.5 cm, BWL achieves more optimal resection volumes without compromising margin status compared with WGL. Moreover, BWL seems a suitable alternative to US in patients with poorly ultrasound-visible breast tumors and patients with a small tumor in a (large) breast.
早期乳腺癌的导丝定位(WGL)可以通过使用多根导丝来实现,这被称为“框式导丝定位(BWL)”。本研究的主要目的是比较 BWL 和传统 WGL 对最小化切除体积的影响,同时不影响切缘状态。其次,评估 BWL 作为术中超声(US)引导在 US 上难以定义的乳腺肿瘤中的替代方法。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受广泛局部切除的术前诊断为乳腺癌的患者。患有多灶性疾病或新辅助治疗的患者被排除在本研究之外。使用计算的切除比(CRR)评估最佳切除和最小健康乳腺组织切除。
17 例(9%)患者行 BWL,44 例(22%)患者行 WGL,139 例(70%)患者行 US。三组患者的阴性切缘率均相似。在直径大于 1.5cm 的肿瘤中,BWL 的 CRR(0.6)显著小于 WGL(1.3)。此外,BWL(0.8)的 CRR 也小于 US(1.7)。这可以解释为 US 组中大量的小肿瘤(≤1.5cm)获得的 CRR 大于大肿瘤(>1.5cm)(1.9 比 1.4;P=0.005)。
对于直径大于 1.5cm 的乳腺肿瘤,BWL 与 WGL 相比,可获得更优化的切除体积,而不影响切缘状态。此外,对于超声可见性差的乳腺肿瘤患者和乳腺内小肿瘤(大)的患者,BWL 似乎是 US 的一种合适替代方法。