• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证《女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿/疑惑者体育活动障碍问卷》。

Development and validation of the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning persons.

机构信息

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V9, Canada.

Departament d'Educació Física i Esportiva, Facultat de Ciències de l'Activitat Física i l'Esport, Universitat de València, Valencia, 46010 Spain.

出版信息

Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.020
PMID:32653629
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to develop the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning (BPASQ-LGBTQ+ [encompassing all spectrums of sexuality and gender]) persons (LGBT), which measures barriers using a socio-ecological model, and to validate it through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Validation study.

METHODS

First, content validity was achieved by (a) developing a bank of items, (b) discussing the adequacy of the items in a committee of experts and classifying the selected ones under three socio-ecological levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental) and (c) refining wording and relevance of the items after a pilot test. Second, 709 LGBTQ+ persons completed the questionnaire online to establish construct validity, criterion validity and internal consistency.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis revealed four underlying factors in the BPASQ-LGBTQ+, thus suggesting that the items initially considered as 'environmental barriers' could be constituting two separate factors based on social interactions or organizational aspects. Competing three- and four-factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The four-factor structure with two different factors accounting for environmental barriers obtained better values in all fit indices. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.745 to 0.813. Participants engaging in regular physical activity and sports reported lower scores in all the barriers subscales than their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

The BPASQ-LGBTQ+ is valid and reliable to measure barriers to physical activity and sports in LGBTQ+ people across the different socio-ecological levels. It could be especially useful for understanding the complex relationships between these barriers, which is of great relevance for the design and implementation of interventions addressed to encourage physically active lifestyles among LGBTQ+ people.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿/疑问者(BPASQ-LGBTQ+[涵盖所有性取向和性别])人群开发一个使用社会生态学模型测量障碍的《体育活动和运动障碍问卷》,并通过探索性和验证性因子分析对其进行验证。

研究设计

验证性研究。

方法

首先,通过(a)开发项目库、(b)在专家委员会中讨论项目的充分性并将选定的项目分类为三个社会生态学水平(个体内部、人际间、环境)以及(c)在试点测试后完善措辞和相关性,实现内容有效性。其次,709 名 LGBTQ+人员在线完成问卷以建立结构有效性、效标有效性和内部一致性。

结果

探索性因子分析显示,BPASQ-LGBTQ+有四个潜在因素,这表明最初被认为是“环境障碍”的项目可以根据社会互动或组织方面构成两个单独的因素。使用验证性因子分析测试了具有三个和四个因子的竞争模型。四因子结构中有两个不同的因子可以解释环境障碍,在所有拟合指数中获得了更好的值。克朗巴赫的阿尔法值范围从 0.745 到 0.813。与他们的对照组相比,经常参加体育活动和运动的参与者在所有障碍子量表中的得分都较低。

结论

BPASQ-LGBTQ+在不同社会生态学水平上测量 LGBTQ+人群体育活动障碍是有效和可靠的。它对于理解这些障碍之间的复杂关系特别有用,这对于设计和实施旨在鼓励 LGBTQ+人群积极生活方式的干预措施具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning persons.开发并验证《女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿/疑惑者体育活动障碍问卷》。
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Is the Lack of Specific Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) Health Care Education in Medical School a Cause for Concern? Evidence From a Survey of Knowledge and Practice Among UK Medical Students.医学院缺乏针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及酷儿/疑问者(LGBTQ)的医疗保健教育是否值得担忧?来自对英国医学生知识与实践调查的证据。
J Homosex. 2017;64(3):367-381. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1190218. Epub 2016 May 16.
3
Identity Abuse as a Tactic of Violence in LGBTQ Communities: Initial Validation of the Identity Abuse Measure.身份滥用作为 LGBTQ 群体中的暴力手段:身份滥用测量表的初步验证。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2656-2676. doi: 10.1177/0886260518760018. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
4
Differences in Healthcare Access, Use, and Experiences Within a Community Sample of Racially Diverse Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning Emerging Adults.在一个种族多样化的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和疑问的青年新兴成年人的社区样本中,在医疗保健获取、使用和体验方面存在差异。
LGBT Health. 2016 Dec;3(6):434-442. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0124. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Development of the Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments.行动不便者身体活动障碍问卷的编制
Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):547-56. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
A Qualitative Exploration of LGBTQ+ and Intersecting Identities Within Physical Activity Contexts.体育活动背景下LGBTQ+及交叉身份的质性探索
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018 Dec 1;40(6):325-335. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2018-0090. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Trends in Deaths by Suicide 2014-2019 Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, and Other Gender/Sexual Minority (LGBTQ+) Youth.2014-2019 年女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、疑问和其他性别/性少数群体(LGBTQ+)青年自杀死亡趋势。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Nov;71(5):609-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Evaluation of the Three National Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority (LGBTQ+)-Competent Provider Directories in the United States.美国三个全国男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和其他性与性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)合格提供者名录评估。
J Homosex. 2023 Jul 29;70(9):1718-1724. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2040930. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.美国的歧视:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿美国人的经历。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1454-1466. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13229. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
The process of developing a community-based research agenda with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth in the Northwest Territories, Canada.在加拿大西北地区与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年共同制定基于社区的研究议程的过程。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Aug 24;74:28188. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.28188. eCollection 2015.