Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, Denbighshire, UK.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1629-1650. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03694-9. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
To evaluate the comparative outcomes and clinical characteristics of simultaneous and staged colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases.
We conducted a systematic search of electronic information sources, and bibliographic reference lists. Perioperative morbidity and mortality, anastomotic leak, wound infection, bile leak, bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, sub-phrenic abscess, reoperation, recurrence, 5-year overall survival, procedure time, and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using random-effects model.
We identified 41 comparative studies reporting a total of 12,081 patients who underwent simultaneous (n = 5013) or staged (n = 7068) resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. There were significantly lower use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003), higher right-sided colonic resections (p < 0.00001), and minor hepatic resections (p < 0.00001) in the simultaneous group. The simultaneous resection was associated with significantly lower rate of bleeding (OR 0.60, p = 0.03) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD - 5.40, p < 0.00001) compared to the staged resection. However, no significant difference was found in perioperative morbidity (OR1.04, p = 0.63), mortality (RD 0.00, p = 0.19), anastomotic leak (RD 0.01, p = 0.33), bile leak (OR 0.83, p = 0.50), wound infection (OR 1.17, p = 0.19), intra-abdominal abscess (RD 0.01, p = 0.26), sub-phrenic abscess (OR 1.26, p = 0.48), reoperation (OR 1.32, p = 0.18), recurrence (OR 1.33, p = 0.10), 5-year overall survival (OR 0.88, p = 0.19), or procedure time (MD - 23.64, p = 041) between two groups.
Despite demonstrating nearly comparable outcomes, the best available evidence (level 2) regarding simultaneous and staged colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases is associated with major selection bias. It is time to conduct high-quality randomised studies with respect to burden and laterality of disease. We recommend the staged approach for complex cases.
评估同时性结直肠肝转移患者行结直肠和肝脏同期与分期切除术的对比结局和临床特征。
我们系统地检索了电子信息源和参考文献列表。评估的结果参数包括围手术期发病率和死亡率、吻合口漏、伤口感染、胆漏、出血、腹腔脓肿、膈下脓肿、再次手术、复发、5 年总生存率、手术时间和住院时间。使用随机效应模型计算联合总效应大小。
我们共确定了 41 项比较研究,共纳入 12081 例同时性(n=5013)或分期性(n=7068)行结直肠肝转移切除术的患者。同时性组的新辅助化疗使用率明显较低(p=0.003),右半结肠切除术(p<0.00001)和较小的肝切除术(p<0.00001)更多。与分期切除术相比,同期切除术的出血率显著降低(OR 0.60,p=0.03),住院时间更短(MD -5.40,p<0.00001)。然而,围手术期发病率(OR 1.04,p=0.63)、死亡率(RD 0.00,p=0.19)、吻合口漏(RD 0.01,p=0.33)、胆漏(OR 0.83,p=0.50)、伤口感染(OR 1.17,p=0.19)、腹腔脓肿(RD 0.01,p=0.26)、膈下脓肿(OR 1.26,p=0.48)、再次手术(OR 1.32,p=0.18)、复发(OR 1.33,p=0.10)、5 年总生存率(OR 0.88,p=0.19)或手术时间(MD -23.64,p=0.41)在两组之间均无显著差异。
尽管同时性和分期性结直肠和肝脏切除术在治疗同时性结直肠肝转移患者方面显示出几乎相当的结果,但目前最佳的证据(2 级)存在严重的选择偏倚。现在是时候就疾病的负担和侧别进行高质量的随机研究了。我们建议对复杂病例采用分期方法。