Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Sep;38(9):735.e9-735.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
A high percent positive biopsy cores (PBC), typically dichotomized at ≥50% is prognostic of worse cancer-specific outcomes for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (CaP). The clinical significance of ≥50% PBC for patients with high-risk disease is poorly understood. We examined the association between ≥50% PBC, compared to <50% PBC, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) for patients with high-risk disease.
We identified 7,569 men from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program who were diagnosed with high-risk CaP (Gleason score of 8-10, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or cT3-T4 stage) in 2010-2011 and had 6 to 24 cores sampled at biopsy. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression was utilized to examine the association between ≥50% PBC and PCSM.
Median follow-up was 3.8 years. 56.2% of patients (4,253) had ≥50% PBC. On competing risks regression, ≥50% PBC was associated with a significantly higher risk of PCSM compared to <50% PBC (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-2.70, P < 0.001). On subgroup analyses, ≥50% PBC was associated with a significantly higher risk of PCSM only for cT1-T2 disease (AHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.62-3.07) but not cT3-T4 disease (AHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39-1.76), with a significant interaction (P = 0.016). No significant interactions by Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, use of definitive therapy, or number of biopsy cores sampled were observed.
In this large cohort of patients with high-risk CaP, ≥50% PBC was independently associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of PCSM for patients with cT1-T2, but not cT3-T4, tumors. Percent PBC, which is a widely available clinical value, should be routinely used to risk stratify men with high-risk disease and identify patients whom may benefit from treatment intensification.
高比例阳性活检核心(PBC),通常以≥50%进行二分法,对低危和中危前列腺癌(CaP)患者的癌症特异性结局具有预后意义。对于高危疾病患者,≥50%PBC 的临床意义尚不清楚。我们研究了与<50%PBC 相比,≥50%PBC 与高危疾病患者的前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)之间的关系。
我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划中确定了 7569 名 2010-2011 年被诊断为高危 CaP(Gleason 评分 8-10、前列腺特异性抗原>20ng/mL 或 cT3-T4 期)的男性,并且在活检时接受了 6 至 24 个核心样本的取样。多变量 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归用于检查≥50%PBC 与 PCSM 之间的关系。
中位随访时间为 3.8 年。56.2%的患者(4253 人)有≥50%的 PBC。在竞争风险回归中,与<50%PBC 相比,≥50%PBC 与 PCSM 风险显著增加相关(调整后的危险比[HR]2.00,95%置信区间[CI]1.48-2.70,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,仅对于 cT1-T2 疾病,≥50%PBC 与 PCSM 风险显著增加相关(HR 2.23,95%CI 1.62-3.07),而对于 cT3-T4 疾病则无显著相关性(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.39-1.76),且存在显著交互作用(P=0.016)。未观察到与 Gleason 评分、前列腺特异性抗原水平、确定性治疗的使用或取样的活检核心数量相关的显著交互作用。
在这一大规模高危 CaP 患者队列中,≥50%PBC 与 cT1-T2 肿瘤患者的 PCSM 风险增加约 2 倍独立相关,但与 cT3-T4 肿瘤患者无关。PBC 百分比是一种广泛可用的临床值,应常规用于对高危疾病患者进行风险分层,并确定可能受益于治疗强化的患者。