Department of Psychiatry, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;67(2):136-143. doi: 10.1177/0020764020934512. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The application of the structural vulnerability construct in medicine addresses social structures as the source of health inequities. Evidence demonstrates structural vulnerability as the meta-problem that underlie health disparities faced by underrepresented minorities who are less likely to access care and face stigma for substance use disorders (SUDs).
The objective of this study is to assess perceived vulnerability at the structural and interpersonal levels depicted by barriers to care, treatment-related stigma and anticipated discrimination among African Americans with SUDs.
Participants were 58 consecutive African American patients receiving treatment at an acute inpatient substance use service of a teaching hospital from September to November 2019. Structural vulnerability, barriers to care and anticipated discrimination were assessed using the structural vulnerability assessment tool, Barriers to Access Care Evaluation (BACE) and the Questionnaire on Anticipated Discrimination (QUAD) surveys, respectively.
The total mean scores for the BACE-3, BACE-3 stigma subscale and QUAD were 1.0, 1.15 and 1.51, respectively. No statistically significant differences are found in the stigma subscale based on gender and psychiatric diagnosis ( > .05). Furthermore, there were also no gender, age or differences based on psychiatric diagnosis across both the BACE and QUAD scales.
Structural and interpersonal factors remain sources of vulnerability, stigma and anticipated discrimination for African Americans with SUDs and comorbid mental illness.
医学中结构脆弱性结构的应用将社会结构视为健康不平等的根源。有证据表明,结构脆弱性是少数族裔代表性不足者面临的健康差距的元问题,他们更不可能获得医疗服务,并因药物使用障碍(SUD)而面临污名化。
本研究旨在评估 SUD 非洲裔美国人在护理障碍、与治疗相关的污名和预期歧视方面所表现出的结构和人际层面的感知脆弱性。
2019 年 9 月至 11 月,研究对象为在一家教学医院的急性住院物质使用服务机构接受治疗的 58 例连续的非裔美国 SUD 患者。使用结构脆弱性评估工具、护理障碍评估量表(BACE)和预期歧视问卷(QUAD)分别评估结构脆弱性、护理障碍和预期歧视。
BACE-3、BACE-3 污名子量表和 QUAD 的总分分别为 1.0、1.15 和 1.51。基于性别和精神诊断,BACE-3 量表的污名子量表没有发现统计学差异(>0.05)。此外,BACE 和 QUAD 量表在性别、年龄或基于精神诊断的差异方面也没有差异。
对于 SUD 合并精神疾病的非裔美国人来说,结构和人际因素仍然是脆弱性、污名化和预期歧视的来源。