Laboratory of Water, Biodiversity and Climate Change (EauBioDiCc), Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, University Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco and National Center for Studies and Research on Water and Energy (CNEREE), BP/511, University Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco E-mail:
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7178, F-67000 Strasbourg, France; Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, M2P2, Equipe Procédés Membranaires (EPM), Aix en Provence Cedex, France.
Water Sci Technol. 2020 May;81(9):1914-1926. doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.247.
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) has been proven to be an efficient technology capable of treating various industrial effluents. However, the evaluation of its performances in the case of olive mill wastewater (OMW) over a conventional activated sludge (CAS) have not been determined yet. The present study aims to compare OMW treatment in two laboratory scale pilots: an external ceramic MBR and CAS starting with an acclimation step in both reactors by raising OMW concentration progressively. After the acclimation step, the reactors received OMW at 2 g/L with respect to an organic loading rate of 0.2 and 0.3 kg/kg/d for MBR and CAS, respectively. Biomass acclimation occurred successfully in both systems; however, the MBR tolerated more OMW toxicity than CAS as the MBR always maintained an effluent with a better quality. At a stable state, a higher reduction of 95% chemical oxygen demand (COD) was obtained with MBR compared to CAS (86%), but both succeeded in polyphenols removal (80%). Moreover, a higher MLSS elimination from the MBR treated water (97%) was measured against 88% for CAS. Therefore, CAS was suitable for OMW treatment and MBR could be proposed as an alternative to CAS when a better quality of treated water is required.
膜生物反应器(MBR)已被证明是一种能够处理各种工业废水的有效技术。然而,其在橄榄压榨废水(OMW)处理方面的性能评估与传统活性污泥(CAS)相比尚未确定。本研究旨在通过在两个反应器中逐步提高 OMW 浓度来进行两个实验室规模的试验:外部陶瓷 MBR 和 CAS,比较 OMW 的处理。在适应阶段之后,MBR 和 CAS 的有机负荷率分别为 0.2 和 0.3kg/kg/d,以 2g/L 的 OMW 浓度处理反应器。生物量在两个系统中都成功适应;然而,MBR 比 CAS 耐受更多的 OMW 毒性,因为 MBR 始终保持着更好的出水质量。在稳定状态下,MBR 比 CAS 获得了更高的化学需氧量(COD)去除率(95%比 86%),但两者都成功地去除了多酚(80%)。此外,从 MBR 处理水中测量到更高的 MLSS 消除率(97%),而 CAS 为 88%。因此,CAS 适用于 OMW 处理,而当需要更好的处理水质量时,MBR 可以作为 CAS 的替代方案。