Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Population Health Sciences Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1915-1927. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13085. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The number of older people living with complex health conditions is increasing, with the majority of these managed in primary and community settings. Many models of care have been developed to support them, however, there is mixed evidence on their value and they include multiple overlapping components. We aimed to synthesise the evidence to learn what works for managing complex conditions in older people in primary and community care. We carried out a state-of-the-art review of systematic reviews. We searched three databases (January 2009 to July 2019) for models of primary and community care for long-term conditions, frailty, multimorbidity and complex neurological conditions common to older people such as dementia. We narratively synthesised review findings to summarise the evidence for each model type and identify components which influenced effectiveness. Out of 2,129 unique titles and abstracts, 178 full texts were reviewed and 54 systematic reviews were included. We found that the models of care were more likely to improve depressive symptoms and mental health outcomes than physical health or service use outcomes. Interventions including self-management, patient education, assessment with follow-up care procedures, and structured care processes or pathways had greater evidence of effectiveness. The level of healthcare service integration appeared to be more important than inclusion of specific professional types within a team. However, more experienced and qualified nurses were associated with better outcomes. These conclusions are limited by the overlap between reviews, reliance on vote counting within some included reviews and the quality of study reports. In conclusion, primary and community care interventions for complex conditions in older people should include: (a) clear intervention targets; (b) explicit theoretical underpinnings; and (c) elements of self-management and patient education, structured collaboration between healthcare professionals and professional support. Further work needs to determine the optimal intensity, length, team composition and role of technology in interventions.
随着患有复杂健康状况的老年人数量不断增加,其中大多数在初级和社区环境中得到管理。已经开发了许多护理模式来支持他们,但是,关于这些模式的价值存在混合证据,并且它们包含多个重叠的组成部分。我们旨在综合证据,了解在初级和社区护理中管理老年人复杂疾病的方法。我们对系统评价进行了最新综述。我们在三个数据库中进行了搜索(2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月),以查找针对老年人常见的长期疾病、虚弱、多种疾病和复杂神经疾病(如痴呆症)的初级和社区护理模式。我们对综述结果进行了叙述性综合,以总结每种模型类型的证据,并确定影响有效性的组成部分。在 2,129 个独特的标题和摘要中,有 178 篇全文进行了审查,其中包括 54 项系统评价。我们发现,护理模式更有可能改善抑郁症状和心理健康结果,而不是改善身体健康或服务使用结果。包括自我管理、患者教育、评估与后续护理程序以及结构化护理流程或途径的干预措施具有更大的有效性证据。医疗保健服务整合水平似乎比团队中特定专业类型的纳入更为重要。但是,经验丰富且合格的护士与更好的结果相关。这些结论受到综述之间的重叠、一些包含的综述中投票计数的依赖以及研究报告的质量的限制。总之,针对老年人复杂疾病的初级和社区护理干预措施应包括:(a)明确的干预目标;(b)明确的理论基础;(c)自我管理和患者教育要素、医疗保健专业人员之间的结构化协作以及专业支持。还需要进一步的工作来确定干预措施的最佳强度、长度、团队组成和技术作用。