Baker Tilly LLP, One Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10119. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Jul 1;26(7):e205-e210. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43763.
Previous studies on Medicare populations have shown improved outcomes and decreased 90-day episode-of-care costs with robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate expenditures and utilization following RATKA in the population younger than 65 years.
This is a retrospective longitudinal analysis of a commercial claims data set.
TKA procedures were identified using the OptumInsight Inc database. The procedures were stratified in 2 groups: the RATKA and manual TKA (MTKA) cohorts. Propensity score matching was performed at 1:5. Utilization and associated costs were analyzed for 90 days following the index procedure. A total of 357 RATKA and 1785 MTKA procedures were included in this analysis.
Within 90 days post surgery, patients who had RATKA were less likely to utilize inpatient services (2.24% vs 4.37%; P = .0444) and skilled nursing facilities (1.68% vs 6.05%; P < .0001). No patients in the RATKA group went to inpatient rehabilitation, whereas 0.90% of the MTKA arm went to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Patients who utilized home health aides in the RATKA arm utilized significantly fewer home health days (5.33 vs 6.36 days; P = .0037). Costs associated with overall postsurgery expenditures were $1332 less in the RATKA arm ($6857 vs $8189; P = .0018). The 90-day global expenditures (index plus post surgery) were $4049 less in the RATKA arm ($28,204 vs $32,253; P < .0001). Length of stay after surgery was nearly a day less for the RATKA arm (1.80 vs 2.72 days; P < .0001).
RATKA was associated with shorter length of stay, reduced utilization of services, and reduced 90-day payer costs compared with MTKA.
先前针对医疗保险人群的研究表明,与手动全膝关节置换术(MTKA)相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RATKA)可改善术后结局并降低 90 天治疗费用。本研究旨在评估 65 岁以下人群接受 RATKA 后的支出和利用情况。
这是一项使用 OptumInsight Inc 数据库的回顾性纵向分析。
使用 OptumInsight Inc 数据库确定 TKA 手术。将手术分为 2 组:RATKA 和 MTKA 队列。采用 1:5 的倾向评分匹配。分析指数手术后 90 天内的使用情况和相关费用。本分析共纳入 357 例 RATKA 和 1785 例 MTKA 手术。
术后 90 天内,接受 RATKA 的患者较少使用住院服务(2.24%比 4.37%;P=0.0444)和疗养院(1.68%比 6.05%;P<0.0001)。RATKA 组无患者接受住院康复治疗,而 MTKA 组有 0.90%的患者接受住院康复治疗。使用 RATKA 组的家庭健康助手的患者使用的家庭健康天数明显较少(5.33 天比 6.36 天;P=0.0037)。RATKA 组的总术后支出相关费用减少了 1332 美元(6857 美元比 8189 美元;P=0.0018)。RATKA 组 90 天的全球支出(指数加术后)减少了 4049 美元(28204 美元比 32253 美元;P<0.0001)。RATKA 组的术后住院时间缩短了近一天(1.80 天比 2.72 天;P<0.0001)。
与 MTKA 相比,RATKA 与较短的住院时间、服务利用减少以及 90 天支付者成本降低相关。