Department of Health Care Administration, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Jun 23;22(3):529-550. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2019-0319.
The objective of this research is to synthesize evidence on the relationship between context, strategies and performance in the context of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), a core safety net health services provider in the United States. The research also identifies prior approaches to measure contextual factors, FQHC strategy and performance. Gaps in the research are identified, and directions for future research are provided.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles published between the years 1997 and 2017 was conducted using a bibliographic search of PubMed, Business Source Premier and ABI/Inform databases.
28 studies were selected for the analysis. Results supported associations among contextual factors (organizational and environmental) and FQHC strategy and FQHC performance. The research also indicates that previous research was primarily emphasized on clinical performance with less focus on other types of FQHC performance. In addition, there exists a wide variability in terms of measuring context, FQHC strategy and performance.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Operating in resource-scarce and highly constraining environments, FQHCs have demonstrated the ability to stay innovative and competent as serving often unhealthier and costlier patient populations. To date, there has been no study that reviewed the relationships between context, FQHC strategy and FQHC performance. In addition, there is an absence of consensus on how context, FQHC strategy and FQHC performance are measured. This study is the first that examined context-strategy-performance relationships in the context of FQHCs.
本研究旨在综合有关联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)背景、策略和绩效之间关系的证据,FQHC 是美国核心的安全网卫生服务提供者。本研究还确定了先前衡量背景因素、FQHC 策略和绩效的方法。确定了研究中的差距,并为未来的研究提供了方向。
设计/方法/方法:使用 PubMed、Business Source Premier 和 ABI/Inform 数据库的书目搜索,对 1997 年至 2017 年期间发表的同行评议期刊文章进行了系统回顾。
选择了 28 项研究进行分析。结果支持背景因素(组织和环境)与 FQHC 策略和 FQHC 绩效之间的关联。研究还表明,先前的研究主要侧重于临床绩效,而对其他类型的 FQHC 绩效关注较少。此外,在衡量背景、FQHC 策略和绩效方面存在很大的差异。
原创性/价值:在资源匮乏和高度受限的环境中运作,FQHC 表现出保持创新和竞争力的能力,因为它们经常为健康状况较差和成本较高的患者群体提供服务。迄今为止,还没有研究审查背景、FQHC 策略和 FQHC 绩效之间的关系。此外,如何衡量背景、FQHC 策略和 FQHC 绩效还没有达成共识。本研究首次在 FQHC 背景下考察了背景-策略-绩效关系。