Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh, India.
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr-Jun;64(2):146-152.
Canalicular injury is commonly encountered in lid trauma. A multitude of techniques and stents are available to manage canalicular lacerations. Monocanalicular stents offer a simple, technically easy and cost-effective solution for managing such cases. This is a retrospective review of the patients presenting with canalicular lacerations to a tertiary eye hospital from January 2014 to September 2017. We evaluated factors like time of surgery, cause of injury, time of stent removal and their association with the surgical outcome. Additionally, we also reviewed the current data available in literature on the exclusive use of monocanalicular stents for the management of all types of canalicular injuries. Retrospective patient file review. We evaluated 30 cases of canalicular injuries in 30 patients. The majority of our patients were males (24, 80%), and the mean age was 32.11±15.09 (4-59) years. The mode of injury was road traffic accidents (RTA) in 20 (66.7%), assault with sharp edged weapons in 8 (26.7%) and dog bite in 2 (6.6%) cases. The mean time of repair was 17.2±9.37 (6-36) hours after injury and the mean time of stent removal/ extrusion was 3.5±0.99 (0.5-5) months. The cases were divided based on time of repair i.e., within 24 hours (21 cases) or after 24 hours (9 cases) from the onset of injury. The extrusion rates were 14.3% (3) and 44.4% (4) respectively in the two groups. Our overall anatomical success rate was 86.7% and functional success rate of 76.7%. Overall failure rate was 23.3% (7 out of 30). Delay in surgery (>24 hours) and dog bites were associated with a poorer prognosis of canalicular repair using monocanalicular stents. FDDT = Fluorescein dye disappearance test, SPSS = Statistical Package for Social Sciences, RTA = Road Traffic Accident.
泪小管损伤在眼睑创伤中很常见。有多种技术和支架可用于治疗泪小管裂伤。单泪小管支架为这类病例提供了一种简单、技术简单且具有成本效益的解决方案。 这是对 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月间在一家三级眼科医院就诊的泪小管裂伤患者的回顾性研究。我们评估了手术时间、损伤原因、支架取出时间等因素及其与手术结果的关系。此外,我们还回顾了目前文献中关于单泪小管支架在所有类型的泪小管损伤治疗中单独使用的相关数据。 回顾性患者病历回顾。 我们评估了 30 例 30 例泪小管损伤患者的情况。我们的大多数患者为男性(24 例,80%),平均年龄为 32.11±15.09(4-59)岁。损伤模式为道路交通伤 20 例(66.7%)、锐器伤 8 例(26.7%)、狗咬伤 2 例(6.6%)。修复的平均时间为损伤后 17.2±9.37(6-36)小时,支架取出/脱出的平均时间为 3.5±0.99(0.5-5)个月。根据修复时间将病例分为两组,即损伤后 24 小时内(21 例)或 24 小时后(9 例)。两组的脱出率分别为 14.3%(3 例)和 44.4%(4 例)。我们的解剖学总体成功率为 86.7%,功能成功率为 76.7%。 总体失败率为 23.3%(7/30)。手术延迟(>24 小时)和狗咬伤与使用单泪小管支架修复泪小管的预后较差有关。 FDDT =荧光素染料消失试验,SPSS =社会科学统计软件包,RTA =道路交通意外。