Williams Erica L, Hovenden Mark J, Close Dugald C
School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 55, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Current address; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 55, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Corresponding author; email:
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Jan;30(12):1205-1218. doi: 10.1071/FP03145.
Alpine environments are characterised by low temperatures and high light intensities. This combination leads to high light stress owing to the imbalance between light energy harvesting and its use in photochemistry. In extreme cases, high light stress can lead to the level of photo-oxidative damage exceeding the rate of repair to the photosynthetic apparatus. Plant species may vary in the mechanisms they use to prevent photodamage, but most comparisons are of geographically and ecologically distinct species. Differences in leaf colouration suggested that photoprotective strategies might differ among Tasmanian evergreen alpine shrub species. We compared chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf pigment composition in six co-occurring alpine shrub species on the summit of Mt Wellington, southern Tasmania, Australia, during spring and autumn. We found marked differences among species in light energy utilisation, attenuation and dissipation. Ozothamnus ledifolius maintained a large capacity for photosynthetic light utilisation and thus, had a low requirement for light dissipation. All five of the other species relied on xanthophyll-cycle-dependent thermal energy dissipation. In addition Epacris serpyllifolia, Richea sprengelioides and Leptospermum rupestre had foliar anthocyanins that would attenuate photosynthetically active light in the leaf. During spring, all species retained de-epoxidised xanthophylls through the night and the pre-dawn concentration of antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin was significantly correlated with reductions in pre-dawn F / F. We propose that these species use three photoprotective strategies to cope with the combination of high light and low temperature.
高山环境的特点是低温和高光强度。这种组合由于光能捕获与其在光化学中的利用之间的不平衡而导致高光胁迫。在极端情况下,高光胁迫会导致光氧化损伤水平超过光合装置的修复速率。植物物种在用于防止光损伤的机制上可能有所不同,但大多数比较是针对地理和生态上不同的物种。叶片颜色的差异表明,塔斯马尼亚常绿高山灌木物种的光保护策略可能不同。我们在春季和秋季比较了澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚南部惠灵顿山山顶上六种共生高山灌木物种的叶绿素荧光和叶片色素组成。我们发现物种之间在光能利用、衰减和耗散方面存在显著差异。细叶澳石南保持着较大的光合光利用能力,因此对光耗散的需求较低。其他五个物种都依赖于依赖叶黄素循环的热能耗散。此外,匍匐澳石南、斯氏帚石南和岩生细籽木的叶片含有花青素,这些花青素会减弱叶片中光合有效光。在春季,所有物种在夜间都保留了脱环氧化叶黄素,黎明前花药黄质和玉米黄质的浓度与黎明前F / F的降低显著相关。我们认为这些物种使用三种光保护策略来应对高光和低温的组合。