Suppr超能文献

上颌和下颌正畸粘结保持器的长期有效性

Long-term Effectiveness of Maxillary and Mandibular Bonded Orthodontic Retainers.

作者信息

Kocher Katharina E, Gebistorf Meret C, Pandis Nikolaos, Fudalej Piotr S, Katsaros Christos

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Jul 24;18(3):633-641. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a44939.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study investigated the long-term effectiveness of one type of maxillary and 2 types of mandibular fixed lingual retainers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty orthodontic patients in retention for 10-15 years were included. Irregularity index, intercanine width, overjet (OJ) and overbite (OB) were measured on plaster models at 3 occasions: (T1) pre-treatment, (T2) post-treatment and (T3) 10-15 years post-treatment. Analyses assessed the effect of the retainer type and time on mandibular irregularity, intercanine width and retainer failure.

RESULTS

In the mandible, the irregularity index increased (0.43 mm) between T2 and T3 for the 0.027" β-titanium (TMA) retainers bonded to canines only while it was stable (-0.02 mm) for the 0.016" x 0.022" braided stainless steel retainers (SS6) bonded to all six anterior teeth. The intercanine width was relatively stable in both groups during the entire observation period. In the maxilla, the irregularity index was stable between T2 and T3 (+0.07 mm). The intercanine width increased (+2.02 mm) during treatment T1-T2 and was stable (-0.02 mm) in the retention phase T2 to T3.

CONCLUSIONS

In the mandible, SS6 retainers were slightly more effective in maintaining alignment compared to the TMA retainers. In the maxilla, the SS4 retainers without canine extensions were effective in maintaining alignment. All retainers were effective in maintaining the intercanine width.

摘要

目的

本回顾性队列研究调查了一种上颌固定舌侧保持器和两种下颌固定舌侧保持器的长期有效性。

材料与方法

纳入80例保持正畸治疗效果10至15年的患者。在三个时间点(T1)治疗前、(T2)治疗后以及(T3)治疗后10至15年,在石膏模型上测量牙列不齐指数、尖牙间宽度、覆盖(OJ)和覆合(OB)。分析评估保持器类型和时间对下颌牙列不齐、尖牙间宽度和保持器失败的影响。

结果

在下颌,仅粘结于尖牙的0.027英寸β-钛(TMA)保持器在T2至T3期间牙列不齐指数增加(0.43毫米),而粘结于全部六颗前牙的0.016英寸×0.022英寸编织不锈钢保持器(SS6)则保持稳定(-0.02毫米)。在整个观察期内,两组的尖牙间宽度相对稳定。在上颌,T2至T3期间牙列不齐指数保持稳定(+0.07毫米)。尖牙间宽度在治疗期T1至T2期间增加(+2.02毫米),在保持期T2至T3期间保持稳定(-0.02毫米)。

结论

在下颌,与TMA保持器相比,SS6保持器在维持牙列排齐方面略更有效。在上颌,无尖牙延伸的SS4保持器在维持牙列排齐方面有效。所有保持器在维持尖牙间宽度方面均有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3bc/11654593/d276178f690b/ohpd-18-3-633-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验