Egger Stephan T, Weniger Godehard, Bobes Julio, Seifritz Erich, Vetter Stefan
Centre for Integrative Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, CIBERSAM, Oviedo. Spain.
Centre for Integrative Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul 22. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.05.008.
Psychosocial functioning is a key factor determining prognosis, severity, impairment and quality of life in people who have a mental disorder. The mini-ICF-APP was developed to provide a standardised classification of functioning and disability. However, despite its gaining popularity little is known about its structure and performance. This paper examines the structure of the mini-ICF-APP using factor analysis techniques.
In a clinical sample of 3178 patients, with psychiatric diagnoses from several ICD-10 categories, we analysed internal consistency, item inter-correlations and the factorial structure of the data, with reference to ICD-10 diagnostic categories; Neurocognitive Disorders; Alcohol Use Disorders; Substance Use Disorders; Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders; Bipolar Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Anxiety Disorders; Personality Disorders; and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
We found good internal consistency and item inter-correlations (Cronbach alpha=0.92) for the mini-ICF-APP. We were able to identify pivotal domains (flexibility, assertiveness and intimate relationships), which demonstrate sub-threshold influences on other domains. The factor analysis yielded a one-factor model as ideal for the whole sample and for all diagnostic categories. For some diagnostic categories the data suggested a two or three-factor model, however, with poorer fit indices.
The factor structure of the mini-ICF-APP appears to modify according to the main diagnosis. However, a one-factor model demonstrates better fit regardless of diagnostic category. Consequently, we consider the mini-ICF-APP to be a trans-diagnostic measurement instrument for the assessment and grading of psychosocial functioning. The use of the mini-ICF-APP sum score seems to best reflect the degree of impairment in an individual, even taking into account that affected domains may lead to sub-threshold effects on other domains.
心理社会功能是决定精神障碍患者预后、严重程度、功能损害及生活质量的关键因素。迷你版国际功能、残疾和健康分类应用程序(mini-ICF-APP)旨在对功能和残疾进行标准化分类。然而,尽管它越来越受欢迎,但其结构和性能却鲜为人知。本文运用因子分析技术研究了mini-ICF-APP的结构。
在一个包含3178名患者的临床样本中,这些患者具有来自国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)多个类别的精神科诊断,我们参照ICD-10诊断类别分析了数据的内部一致性、项目间相关性及因子结构;神经认知障碍;酒精使用障碍;物质使用障碍;精神分裂症及精神病性障碍;双相情感障碍;重度抑郁症;焦虑症;人格障碍;以及神经发育障碍。
我们发现mini-ICF-APP具有良好的内部一致性和项目间相关性(克朗巴哈系数α=0.92)。我们能够识别出关键领域(灵活性、坚定性和亲密关系),这些领域对其他领域显示出阈下影响。因子分析得出单因素模型对整个样本和所有诊断类别而言都是理想的。然而,对于某些诊断类别,数据表明双因素或三因素模型,但拟合指数较差。
mini-ICF-APP的因子结构似乎会根据主要诊断而改变。然而,无论诊断类别如何,单因素模型的拟合效果更好。因此,我们认为mini-ICF-APP是一种用于评估和分级心理社会功能的跨诊断测量工具。即使考虑到受影响的领域可能会对其他领域产生阈下效应,使用mini-ICF-APP总分似乎最能反映个体的损害程度。