Suppr超能文献

在高剂量甲氨蝶呤的不同周期中再次给予葡糖醛酸酶:对成人来说是否安全有效?

A second administration of glucarpidase in a different cycle of high-dose methotrexate: Is it safe and effective in adults?

机构信息

Hematology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr;27(3):734-738. doi: 10.1177/1078155220946464. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate intoxication following high-dose methotrexate-induced acute kidney injury is a life-threatening complication. Glucarpidase can quickly reduce extracellular methotrexate to safe levels, but the effectiveness and safety of its use in different episodes of nephrotoxicity remain an unknown area.

CASE REPORT

A 30-year-old male diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma received methotrexate 5 g/m2 intravenous (IV) as part of the first consolidation cycle. On Consolidation 3, he restarted methotrexate at a dose of 3 g/m2 IV showing slow methotrexate elimination, associated myelosuppression, and hepatic toxicity. Glucarpidase was administered (total dose of 2000 International Units (IU)). No adverse events were observed, and his renal function returned to normal. One hundred and six days later, he was diagnosed with leptomeningeal and cerebellar relapse and treatment with methotrexate 3,5 g/m2 IV day 1 and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) 2 g/m2 IV twice per day days 1, 3, and 5 was started. At 36 h from methotrexate infusion, serum creatinine increased up to 1.89 mg/dL and methotrexate concentration was 100 µmol/L. Ara-C was suspended, and a second administration of glucarpidase (2000 IU) was dispensed. No adverse events were noticed, methotrexate levels decreased and renal function progressively improved, recovering completely three weeks later.

DISCUSSION

The effectiveness and safety of the use of glucarpidase in different episodes of nephrotoxicity remain an unknown area, and the rate and consequences of antiglucarpidase antibody formation remain poorly understood. This case report is, to our knowledge, the first case of a second administration of glucarpidase in a different cycle of high-dose methotrexate in an adult patient.

摘要

简介

大剂量甲氨蝶呤诱导急性肾损伤后出现甲氨蝶呤中毒是一种危及生命的并发症。滑囊酶可以迅速将细胞外甲氨蝶呤降低到安全水平,但在不同的肾毒性发作中使用它的有效性和安全性仍是一个未知领域。

病例报告

一名 30 岁男性,诊断为急性淋巴细胞 T 细胞淋巴瘤,在第一个巩固周期中接受了 5g/m2 静脉注射(IV)甲氨蝶呤。在巩固 3 周期时,他以 3g/m2 IV 的剂量重新开始甲氨蝶呤治疗,显示出甲氨蝶呤清除缓慢、伴有骨髓抑制和肝毒性。给予滑囊酶(总剂量 2000 国际单位(IU))。未观察到不良反应,且肾功能恢复正常。106 天后,他被诊断为脑膜和小脑复发,并开始接受 3.5g/m2 IV 甲氨蝶呤第 1 天和 2g/m2 IV 阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)每天 2 次第 1、3 和 5 天治疗。甲氨蝶呤输注后 36 小时,血清肌酐升高至 1.89mg/dL,甲氨蝶呤浓度为 100µmol/L。暂停了 Ara-C,并给予第二次滑囊酶(2000IU)。未观察到不良反应,甲氨蝶呤水平降低,肾功能逐渐改善,3 周后完全恢复。

讨论

滑囊酶在不同的肾毒性发作中的有效性和安全性仍是一个未知领域,抗滑囊酶抗体形成的速度和后果仍知之甚少。据我们所知,这是首例成年患者在高剂量甲氨蝶呤的不同周期中第二次给予滑囊酶的病例报告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验