School of Health Sciences, City, University of London.
School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jan 5;60(1):277-287. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa309.
To determine whether a patient-initiated DMARD self-monitoring service for people on MTX is a cost-effective model of care for patients with RA or PsA.
An economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a randomized controlled trial involving 100 patients. Outcome measures were quality of life and ESR assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Costs were calculated for healthcare usage using a United Kingdom National Health Service economic perspective. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of nurse-led telephone helplines. Uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness ratios was estimated by bootstrapping and analysing the cost-effectiveness planes.
Fifty-two patients received the intervention and 48 usual care. The difference in mean cost per case indicated that the intervention was £263 more expensive (P < 0.001; 95% CI: £149.14, £375.86) when the helpline costs were accounted for and £94 cheaper (P = 0.08; 95% CI: -£199.26, £10.41) when these costs were absorbed by the usual service. There were, however, statistically significant savings for the patient (P = 0.02; 95% CI: -£28.98, £3.00). When costs and effectiveness measures of ESR and quality of life measured, using the Short Form-12v1, were combined this did not show the patient-initiated service to be cost-effective at a statistically significant level.
This patient-initiated service led to reductions in primary and secondary healthcare services that translated into reduced costs, in comparison with usual care, but were not cost-effective. Further work is needed to establish how nurse-led telephone triage services are integrated into rheumatology services and the associated costs of setting up and delivering them.
ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN21613721.
确定患者发起的 MTX 患者 DMARD 自我监测服务是否是 RA 或 PsA 患者的一种具有成本效益的护理模式。
在一项涉及 100 名患者的随机对照试验中,同时进行了经济评估。在基线和干预后评估生活质量和 ESR 作为结果指标。使用英国国家卫生服务的经济视角计算了医疗保健使用的成本。通过引导和分析成本效果平面来进行敏感性分析,以探讨护士主导的电话热线的影响。通过自举法和分析成本效果平面来估计成本效果比的不确定性。
52 名患者接受了干预,48 名患者接受了常规护理。每例病例的平均成本差异表明,当考虑到电话热线的成本时,干预措施的费用高出 263 英镑(P<0.001;95%置信区间:149.14 英镑,375.86 英镑),而当这些成本由常规服务吸收时,费用则低 94 英镑(P=0.08;95%置信区间:-199.26 英镑,10.41 英镑)。然而,对于患者来说,有统计学意义的节省(P=0.02;95%置信区间:-28.98 英镑,3.00 英镑)。当使用 12v1 短期表单测量 ESR 和生活质量的成本和效果措施时,该患者发起的服务并未显示出具有统计学意义的成本效益水平。
与常规护理相比,这种患者发起的服务导致初级和二级医疗服务减少,从而降低了成本,但并不具有成本效益。需要进一步研究如何将护士主导的电话分诊服务整合到风湿病服务中,以及建立和提供这些服务的相关成本。
ClinicalTrials.gov,http://clinicaltrials.gov,ISRCTN21613721。