Division of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo.
Department of Molecular Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Pavia.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct;21(10):733-739. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001047.
: The role of early defibrillation has been well established as a pivotal ring of the chain of survival since the nineties. In the following years, the scientific evidences about the beneficial role of early defibrillation have grown, and most of all, it has been demonstrated that the main determinant of survival is the time of defibrillation more than the type of rescuer. Early lay defibrillation was shown to be more effective than delayed defibrillation by healthcare providers. Moreover, because of the ease of use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), it has been shown that also untrained lay rescuers can safely use an AED leading the guidelines to encourage early defibrillation by untrained lay bystanders. Although strong evidence has demonstrated that an increase in AED use leads to an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival, the rate of defibrillation by laypeople is quite variable worldwide and very low in some realities. Our review of the literature about lay defibrillation highlights that the AED is a life-saving device as simple and well tolerated as underused.
自 90 年代以来,早期除颤在生存链中一直发挥着至关重要的作用,这一点已得到充分证实。在随后的几年中,有关早期除颤有益作用的科学证据不断增加,最重要的是,研究表明,生存的主要决定因素是除颤时间,而不是抢救者的类型。早期的非专业人员除颤比医疗保健提供者的延迟除颤更有效。此外,由于自动体外除颤器(AED)易于使用,已经表明未经培训的非专业人员也可以安全地使用 AED,这也使得指南鼓励未经培训的非专业旁观者进行早期除颤。尽管有强有力的证据表明 AED 使用的增加会导致院外心脏骤停(OHCA)存活率的增加,但在世界范围内,非专业人员进行除颤的比率差异很大,在某些情况下非常低。我们对有关非专业人员除颤的文献进行了回顾,强调 AED 是一种简单易用、未得到充分利用的救生设备。