Suppr超能文献

表面活性剂对基于棕榈油和椰子油的AlO纳米流体雷电击穿电压的影响。

Effect of surfactants on the lightning breakdown voltage of palm oil and coconut oil based AlO nanofluids.

作者信息

Mohamad Nur Aqilah, Azis Norhafiz, Jasni Jasronita, Ab Kadir Mohd Zainal Abidin, Yunus Robiah, Yaakub Zaini

机构信息

Advanced Lightning, Power and Energy Research Centre (ALPER), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Nanotechnology. 2020 Aug 4;31(42):425708. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aba1b9.

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of different types of surfactants on the lightning breakdown voltages of palm oil (PO) and coconut oil (CO) based aluminium oxide (AlO) nanofluids is investigated. Three different types of surfactants were used in this study known as cationic (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)), anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) and non-ionic (oleic acid (OA)). The volume percentage concentrations of AlO dispersed into PO and CO were varied from 0.001% to 0.05%. The ratio of surfactant to the nanoparticles was set to 50% from the volume concentration of nanoparticles which equivalent to 1:2. In total, two types of refined, bleached and deodorized palm oil (RBDPO) and one type of CO were examined for lightning breakdown voltage. The test was carried out based on needle-sphere electrodes configuration with 25 mm gap distance. The presence of AlO improves both positive and negative lightning breakdown voltages of RBDPO and CO. Under the positive and negative polarities, the CTAB does provide further improvements on the lightning breakdown voltages of RBDPOA (1st type of samples) and CO at most of the volume of concentration of AlO. SDS and OA could also further improve the lightning breakdown voltage of CO at certain volume concentration of AlO. On the other hand, the lightning breakdown voltage of RBDPOB based AlO nanofluid (2nd type of samples) does not further improve with the introduction of surfactants. At most of the volume concentration of AlO, the introduction of CTAB further increases the times to breakdown and decrease the average streamer velocities of RBDPOA under both polarities. The same finding is observed for CO under positive polarity with CTAB and SDS as well as under negative polarity in the presence of all surfactants. The streamer velocities and times to breakdown patterns of RBDPOB based AlO nanofluid are inconsistent in the presence of all surfactants. It is found that RBDPO and CO based AlO nanofluids have second mode of streamer whereby the streamer velocities are from 1 km s to 1.63 km s regardless with or without surfactants.

摘要

本文研究了不同类型表面活性剂对基于棕榈油(PO)和椰子油(CO)的氧化铝(AlO)纳米流体雷电击穿电压的影响。本研究使用了三种不同类型的表面活性剂,即阳离子型(十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB))、阴离子型(十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS))和非离子型(油酸(OA))。分散在PO和CO中的AlO的体积百分比浓度在0.001%至0.05%之间变化。表面活性剂与纳米颗粒的比例从纳米颗粒的体积浓度设定为50%,相当于1:2。总共对两种类型的精炼、漂白和脱臭棕榈油(RBDPO)和一种类型的CO进行了雷电击穿电压测试。测试基于针-球电极配置,间隙距离为25毫米。AlO的存在提高了RBDPO和CO的正、负雷电击穿电压。在正负极性下,CTAB在大多数AlO体积浓度下确实进一步提高了RBDPOA(第一类样品)和CO雷电击穿电压。SDS和OA在AlO的特定体积浓度下也能进一步提高CO的雷电击穿电压。另一方面,基于RBDPOB的AlO纳米流体(第二类样品)的雷电击穿电压不会因引入表面活性剂而进一步提高。在大多数AlO体积浓度下,引入CTAB进一步增加了RBDPOA在两种极性下的击穿时间并降低了平均流光速度。在正极性下使用CTAB和SDS以及在所有表面活性剂存在下的负极性下,CO也观察到相同的结果。在所有表面活性剂存在下,基于RBDPOB的AlO纳米流体的流光速度和击穿时间模式不一致。发现基于RBDPO和CO的AlO纳米流体具有第二种流光模式,无论有无表面活性剂,流光速度为1千米/秒至1.63千米/秒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验