Howren M Bryant, Vander Weg Mark W, Christensen Alan J, Kaboli Peter J
Center for Access Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Behavioral Sciences & Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Center for Access Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113244. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113244. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
Patient-centered care has received significant attention and is an integral component of high-quality healthcare. While it is often assumed that most prefer a patient-centered role orientation, such preferences exist along a continuum with some patients preferring a more provider-centered role. The present study examines patient preference data from a randomized clinical trial designed to test the efficacy of a patient activation intervention to promote thiazide prescribing for veteran patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patient preferences for involvement in healthcare were assessed using the 9-item Sharing subscale of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS). The primary aim was to examine differences in discussion of thiazide use in the clinical encounter by those scoring high versus low on the PPOS. Five hundred ninety-five veteran patients were randomized to either one of three intervention groups or a usual care control group. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the three intervention groups relative to the control group indicated that thiazide discussion increased as a function of intervention intensity across both high and low PPOS groups. ORs for the most intensive intervention group were 3.72 (95% CI = 1.61-8.65, p < .01) for high PPOS patients and 6.71 (95% CI = 2.59-10.67, p < .001) for low PPOS patients. Results suggest that this patient activation intervention is effective for veteran patients representing a range of preferred involvement. Consideration of such preferences may be useful in tailoring future interventions in the healthcare context.
以患者为中心的护理受到了广泛关注,是高质量医疗保健的一个重要组成部分。虽然通常认为大多数人更喜欢以患者为中心的角色定位,但这种偏好存在一个连续体,有些患者更喜欢以提供者为中心的角色。本研究检查了一项随机临床试验中的患者偏好数据,该试验旨在测试一项患者激活干预措施对促进为未控制高血压的退伍军人患者开具噻嗪类药物的疗效。使用患者-从业者导向量表(PPOS)的9项分享子量表评估患者参与医疗保健的偏好。主要目的是检查在PPOS上得分高与得分低的患者在临床会诊中使用噻嗪类药物的讨论差异。595名退伍军人患者被随机分配到三个干预组之一或常规护理对照组。相对于对照组,三个干预组的调整后比值比(OR)表明,噻嗪类药物的讨论随着干预强度的增加而增加,在高PPOS组和低PPOS组中均如此。最强化干预组的高PPOS患者的OR为3.72(95%CI = 1.61-8.65,p <.01),低PPOS患者的OR为6.71(95%CI = 2.59-10.67,p <.001)。结果表明,这种患者激活干预措施对代表一系列偏好参与程度的退伍军人患者有效。在医疗保健环境中定制未来干预措施时考虑此类偏好可能会有所帮助。