School of Social Work, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):1888-1900. doi: 10.1111/head.13918. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
This paper provides a critical review of the decision-making process of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) regarding which migraine treatment drugs will be covered under the Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary (ODB).
Under MOHLTC policy, triptans and OnabotulinumtoxinA are available to patients only through the Exceptional Access Program (EAP). This policy, and justifications for it, are examined with reference to clinical guidelines, patient experiences, and health policy literature. The contexts and consequences of compromised access are outlined. Improvements in access to these treatments are suggested by highlighting how a country with similar healthcare infrastructure - Australia - employs policies that more adequately meet the needs of migraine patients as they secure treatments.
Despite clinically significant gains in the discovery of safe and effective migraine-specific treatments the ODB thus far has failed to align its practice with current clinical recommendations. This forces patients to rely heavily on medication that, while still effective for some, is potentially suboptimal. This review concludes it is prudent, at minimum, to follow clinical recommendations that advocate for the removal of triptans from EAP and recategorize them as Limited Use drugs. Ideally, moving them to a general benefit would further remove the barriers experienced by patients attempting to access this treatment.
本文对安大略省卫生和长期护理部(MOHLTC)在安大略省药品福利清单(ODB)中涵盖哪些偏头痛治疗药物的决策过程进行了批判性审查。
根据 MOHLTC 的政策,曲坦类药物和 OnabotulinumtoxinA 只能通过特殊准入计划(EAP)提供给患者。本文参考临床指南、患者体验和卫生政策文献,审查了这一政策及其依据。概述了获取途径受限的情况和后果。通过强调具有类似医疗保健基础设施的国家(澳大利亚)如何采用更能满足偏头痛患者需求的政策来确保获得治疗,提出了改善这些治疗方法获取途径的建议。
尽管在发现安全有效的偏头痛特异性治疗方法方面取得了显著进展,但 ODB 迄今为止未能使其实践与当前的临床建议保持一致。这迫使患者严重依赖某些药物,而这些药物虽然对一些人仍然有效,但可能并不理想。本文认为,至少可以遵循临床建议,将曲坦类药物从 EAP 中移除,并将其重新归类为有限用途药物。理想情况下,将其纳入一般福利范围将进一步消除患者在尝试获得这种治疗时所面临的障碍。