Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, 1202Geneva, Switzerland.
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43:e165. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2000014X.
The debate on cumulative technological culture (CTC) is dominated by social-learning discussions, at the expense of other cognitive processes, leading to flawed circular arguments. I welcome the authors' approach to decouple CTC from social-learning processes without minimizing their impact. Yet, this model will only be informative to understand the evolution of CTC if tested in other cultural species.
关于累积技术文化(CTC)的争论主要集中在社会学习讨论上,而牺牲了其他认知过程,导致有缺陷的循环论证。我欢迎作者提出的将 CTC 与社会学习过程分离的方法,而不低估其影响。然而,如果不在其他文化物种中进行测试,这个模型对于理解 CTC 的进化将只是有启发性的。