Wei L, Zou D, Chen H, Pan S X, Sun Y C, Zhou Y S
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Centre of Stomatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):762-770. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.031.
To compare the clinical efficacy of a kind of complete dentures fabricated using computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflow with that of the complete denture fabricated using conventional workflow.
Twenty edentulous patients were included in this prospective, single-blind, self-controlled clinical trial. Two pairs of complete dentures were fabricated for each participant: one using the functional suitable denture (FSD) system with CAD/CAM, and the other using conventional fabrication workflow. In the final delivery appointment, the conventional dentures worn by the participant for 3 months at first. Then the participant swapped to wear digital denture for another 3 months. The patients' satisfaction and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and oral health impact profile (OHIP-20E) at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months following denture delivery. In addition, the masticatory efficiency of each pair of dentures was measured after three months adaptation period for each type of dentures.
The VAS scores of the twenty patients in FSD denture group on general satisfaction, ease of cleaning, ability to speak, esthetics, stability and oral health status on these six domains were higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery. While the VAS cores in FSD denture group on comfort, ability to chew and ability to chew up were the same as those of conventional denture group. But there was no significant difference (>0.05). The VAS score on each domain in FSD denture group was higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery, three domains of which reached statistical significance ( < 0.05), involving functional limitation, psychological discomfort and total. The masticatory performance of the FSD denture (1.20±0.54) was slightly higher than that for the conventional denture (1.16±0.53), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (=0.691).
The clinical efficacy of the FSD complete denture is comparable to that of the conventional complete denture. As for patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life, FSD dentures received comparable scores as conventional complete dentures did.
比较采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)工作流程制作的全口义齿与采用传统工作流程制作的全口义齿的临床疗效。
本前瞻性、单盲、自身对照临床试验纳入了20名无牙颌患者。为每位参与者制作两对全口义齿:一对采用具有CAD/CAM的功能性合适义齿(FSD)系统制作,另一对采用传统制作工作流程制作。在最终交付预约时,参与者先佩戴传统义齿3个月。然后参与者更换佩戴数字化义齿再3个月。在义齿交付后的基线、2周、1个月、2个月和3个月,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和口腔健康影响量表(OHIP-20E)测量患者的满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。此外,在每种义齿经过三个月适应期后,测量每对义齿的咀嚼效率。
FSD义齿组20名患者在交付后3个月时,在总体满意度、清洁便利性、说话能力、美观性、稳定性和口腔健康状况这六个领域的VAS评分高于传统义齿组。而FSD义齿组在舒适度、咀嚼能力和咀嚼后状态方面的VAS评分与传统义齿组相同。但差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。FSD义齿组在交付后3个月时每个领域的VAS评分高于传统义齿组,其中三个领域达到统计学意义(<0.05),涉及功能受限、心理不适和总分。FSD义齿的咀嚼性能(1.20±0.54)略高于传统义齿(1.16±0.53),但差异未达到统计学意义(=0.691)。
FSD全口义齿的临床疗效与传统全口义齿相当。在患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量方面,FSD义齿与传统全口义齿得分相当。